Inspections of listed buildings — quinquennial reports, conservation management plans, statutory condition reports — require structured, defensible documentation. The platform supports inspection workflows that map cleanly onto recognised heritage reporting conventions.
Component hierarchy
Inspections are structured against the building's component hierarchy — envelope, fabric, fixtures, fittings — with observations recorded at each level and aggregated into the issued report.
Risk and priority grading
Defects are graded for severity and priority using consistent terminology, producing prioritised schedules of repair and recommended actions.
Continuity between inspections
Subsequent inspections re-survey the same component records, preserving trajectory and supporting comparison between inspection cycles.
Frequently asked
- Can reports follow established inspection formats?
- Yes. Reports assemble against customisable templates that mirror established quinquennial and conservation management plan formats.
- Are recommendations citable?
- Yes. Recommendations cite the relevant observations and references, so that successor inspectors can follow the reasoning behind each entry.
Related