Resources
Knowledge Tools

Defect Atlas — Architectural Metalwork

A practical guide to recognising and describing common architectural metalwork conditions and defects during conservation surveys.

Using the Defect Atlas

The Defect Atlas is a recognition and description aid for surveyors recording architectural metalwork. It is designed to support consistent terminology and cautious observation, not to provide diagnosis, treatment or specification.

The atlas helps users:

  • recognise common conditions encountered on architectural metalwork;
  • describe observations in clear, neutral language;
  • avoid unsupported diagnosis of cause or performance;
  • use consistent terminology across surveys and reports.

The atlas does not:

  • confirm causes of deterioration;
  • prescribe treatment or repair;
  • replace material testing or instrumented investigation;
  • replace specialist conservation advice.

Defect categories

Entries in this volume are grouped informally under the broad themes below. Many conditions span more than one theme; record what is observed rather than forcing a single category.

  • Corrosion conditions (surface, localised, advanced, pitting, staining)
  • Coating conditions (breakdown, blistering, flaking)
  • Moisture-related conditions (water trapping, biological growth, deposits)
  • Fixing and joint conditions (failed fixing, loose fixing, joint opening, weld deterioration)
  • Physical conditions (deformation, mechanical damage, cracking, abrasion and wear)
  • Historic intervention (previous repair)

Individual defect entries

20 entries. Use cautious language throughout: describe what is visible, and reserve interpretation for sections explicitly identified as such.

Surface corrosion

Description

Visible corrosion products on exposed metal surfaces.

Typical appearance

Orange-brown, red-brown or dark corrosion products depending on material and exposure.

Possible contributing factors

Moisture retention, coating failure, environmental exposure.

Recording prompts
  • extent
  • location
  • depth where visible
  • associated coating condition
Example observation wording

Corrosion products were recorded on the lower rail adjacent to the fixing point.

Localised corrosion

Description

Corrosion concentrated in discrete areas rather than spread across the surface.

Typical appearance

Patches of corrosion product surrounded by relatively sound metal or coating.

Possible contributing factors

Water pathways, coating defects, contact with dissimilar materials, retained debris.

Recording prompts
  • size and shape of affected area
  • relationship to fixings or joints
  • presence of staining beyond the patch
  • condition of surrounding coating
Example observation wording

Localised corrosion was recorded around the base of the upright, consistent with water retention at the junction.

Advanced corrosion

Description

Corrosion that has progressed sufficiently to suggest possible loss of material.

Typical appearance

Thick, layered or flaking corrosion products; visible reduction or distortion of the original profile.

Possible contributing factors

Prolonged exposure, long-term coating failure, sustained moisture contact.

Recording prompts
  • visible loss of section
  • extent across the element
  • evidence of ongoing activity
  • any associated movement or deflection
Example observation wording

Advanced corrosion was observed along the lower 200 mm of the post, with visible thickening of the corrosion layer.

Coating breakdown

Description

Loss of integrity of a protective paint or coating system.

Typical appearance

Dull, chalky, cracked or thinning coating; partial loss of finish exposing the substrate.

Possible contributing factors

Weathering, UV exposure, age, inadequate preparation of previous systems.

Recording prompts
  • extent of breakdown
  • type of breakdown observed
  • exposure of underlying metal
  • evidence of moisture beneath the coating
Example observation wording

Coating breakdown was recorded across the upper face of the rail, with localised exposure of the substrate.

Coating blistering

Description

Raised bubbles within a coating, indicating loss of adhesion to the substrate.

Typical appearance

Domed or raised areas in the coating, intact or broken, sometimes containing moisture or corrosion product.

Possible contributing factors

Moisture beneath the coating, contamination prior to application, poor adhesion.

Recording prompts
  • size and distribution of blisters
  • whether blisters are intact
  • presence of liquid or corrosion within blisters
  • underlying substrate condition where visible
Example observation wording

Coating blistering was recorded across the sheltered face, with several blisters broken to expose corrosion product beneath.

Coating flaking

Description

Detachment of coating in flakes or sheets, exposing the substrate.

Typical appearance

Lifted, curled or detached coating fragments; exposed metal areas of varying size.

Possible contributing factors

Coating failure, underlying corrosion, repeated thermal cycling, inadequate preparation.

Recording prompts
  • extent of flaking
  • size of detached areas
  • condition of exposed substrate
  • evidence of active loss
Example observation wording

Coating flaking was observed on the upper surface of the gate frame, with exposure of corrosion-stained substrate beneath.

Surface pitting

Description

Small, discrete cavities in the metal surface visible after corrosion product is disturbed or lost.

Typical appearance

Pinpoint to small-diameter pits, isolated or clustered, sometimes obscured by corrosion product.

Possible contributing factors

Chloride contamination, sustained moisture contact, localised electrochemical activity.

Recording prompts
  • distribution of pits
  • approximate density
  • relationship to corrosion products
  • any visible depth where measurable
Example observation wording

Surface pitting was visible on the cleaned area of the bracket, with clustered pits across an area of approximately 50 mm².

Corrosion staining

Description

Discolouration on adjacent surfaces caused by corrosion products migrating from a metal element.

Typical appearance

Brown, orange, green or dark streaks on adjacent stone, render, timber or paint.

Possible contributing factors

Active corrosion upstream of the staining, rainwater wash, runoff pathways.

Recording prompts
  • source of staining if identifiable
  • extent and direction of the stain
  • substrate affected
  • relationship to drainage or weathering patterns
Example observation wording

Corrosion staining was recorded on the limestone plinth below the iron fixing, consistent with rainwater runoff.

Water trapping

Description

Conditions in which water is retained against or within a metal element.

Typical appearance

Pooling, residual moisture, debris-filled junctions, blocked drainage paths or saturated assemblies.

Possible contributing factors

Design detailing, blocked drainage, debris build-up, distortion of components.

Recording prompts
  • location of trapping
  • evidence of repeated wetting
  • associated corrosion or staining
  • presence of debris or vegetation
Example observation wording

Water trapping was observed at the junction between the base plate and the masonry, with associated staining and corrosion product.

Failed fixing

Description

A fixing that no longer performs its intended function, whether through corrosion, fracture or loss.

Typical appearance

Missing, fractured, severely corroded or displaced fixings; visible movement of fixed elements.

Possible contributing factors

Corrosion, fatigue, overload, incompatible materials, prior damage.

Recording prompts
  • location of failed fixings
  • number affected
  • evidence of associated movement
  • condition of surrounding material
Example observation wording

A failed fixing was recorded at the upper bracket, with the bolt sheared and the bracket displaced from its seating.

Loose fixing

Description

A fixing that is still in place but no longer fully restrained.

Typical appearance

Movement under light pressure, visible gap between fixing and host material, surrounding corrosion or staining.

Possible contributing factors

Corrosion at the fixing or substrate, mortar loss, vibration, distortion.

Recording prompts
  • degree of movement
  • associated damage to substrate
  • evidence of past attempts at refixing
  • implications for adjacent components
Example observation wording

A loose fixing was recorded at the lower rail, with visible movement when light hand pressure was applied.

Deformation

Description

Departure of a metal element from its original geometry.

Typical appearance

Bowing, twisting, bending, sagging or out-of-plane movement.

Possible contributing factors

Impact, overload, thermal movement, loss of adjacent support, long-term creep.

Recording prompts
  • type and direction of deformation
  • extent across the element
  • any associated cracking or fixing distress
  • comparison with adjacent unaffected components
Example observation wording

Deformation was recorded in the central bay of the railing, with a visible bow of approximately 20 mm out of plane.

Mechanical damage

Description

Physical damage from impact, abrasion, tooling or external loading.

Typical appearance

Dents, gouges, scrapes, tool marks, fractured edges, missing fragments.

Possible contributing factors

Accidental impact, vehicle contact, maintenance activity, vandalism.

Recording prompts
  • type of damage
  • location and accessibility
  • extent
  • any associated coating or corrosion implications
Example observation wording

Mechanical damage was recorded on the lower section of the gatepost, consistent with vehicle contact.

Cracking

Description

Linear discontinuities through coating, surface or substrate.

Typical appearance

Fine to wide cracks, straight or branching, sometimes following weld lines or section transitions.

Possible contributing factors

Fatigue, overload, casting defects, weld failure, thermal movement, corrosion-induced stress.

Recording prompts
  • crack orientation and length
  • approximate width where visible
  • whether the crack passes through coating only or the substrate
  • any associated movement or staining
Example observation wording

Cracking was observed across the upper face of the cast bracket, extending approximately 60 mm from the casting edge.

Weld deterioration

Description

Loss of integrity at welded joints.

Typical appearance

Corrosion concentrated along weld lines, cracking through or alongside welds, visible loss at weld toes.

Possible contributing factors

Galvanic effects, original weld quality, sustained moisture exposure, stress concentration.

Recording prompts
  • location and length of affected weld
  • type of deterioration observed
  • evidence of movement at the joint
  • condition of adjacent parent material
Example observation wording

Weld deterioration was recorded along the underside of the rail-to-post weld, with corrosion product following the weld line.

Joint opening

Description

Visible separation between components that were originally fitted closely.

Typical appearance

Gaps at junctions, exposed substrate, ingress of debris or vegetation, daylight visible through assemblies.

Possible contributing factors

Movement, corrosion-induced expansion, fixing failure, mortar loss, thermal cycling.

Recording prompts
  • location and width of opening
  • evidence of associated movement
  • presence of debris or moisture within the gap
  • implications for water shedding
Example observation wording

Joint opening was recorded between the base plate and the masonry, with a gap of approximately 5 mm visible at the front edge.

Biological growth

Description

Living organisms colonising metal surfaces or adjacent fabric.

Typical appearance

Algae, lichen, moss, plant growth in joints or on horizontal surfaces.

Possible contributing factors

Moisture retention, sheltered orientation, debris accumulation, lack of maintenance.

Recording prompts
  • type of growth where identifiable
  • extent and location
  • association with water retention
  • any apparent physical effect on the substrate
Example observation wording

Biological growth was recorded across the horizontal top rail, with moss colonising debris retained in the channel.

Surface deposits

Description

Non-biological material accumulated on metal surfaces.

Typical appearance

Soiling, soot, dust crusts, salt deposits, runoff residues.

Possible contributing factors

Atmospheric pollution, rainwater runoff, proximity to ground or vegetation, lack of cleaning.

Recording prompts
  • type of deposit
  • extent and thickness
  • whether deposits obscure underlying condition
  • evidence of associated staining or corrosion
Example observation wording

Surface deposits were recorded on the sheltered face, with a soiling layer obscuring assessment of the underlying coating.

Abrasion and wear

Description

Loss of surface material from repeated contact or use.

Typical appearance

Polished, thinned or grooved surfaces; rounded edges; coating loss in handling zones.

Possible contributing factors

Use, maintenance activity, cleaning regimes, contact with moving parts.

Recording prompts
  • location of wear
  • extent of material loss
  • relationship to use patterns
  • implications for coating continuity
Example observation wording

Abrasion and wear were recorded on the handle of the gate, with the coating lost across a worn area approximately 80 mm long.

Previous repair

Description

Evidence of earlier intervention to the metal element.

Typical appearance

Patches, welded inserts, replacement sections, applied coatings, fillers, mismatched components.

Possible contributing factors

Past damage, historic maintenance, programme of phased repair.

Recording prompts
  • type of repair observed
  • extent and location
  • apparent condition of the repair
  • compatibility with surrounding original fabric where assessable
Example observation wording

A previous repair was recorded at the lower rail, comprising a welded plate of differing profile to the original section.

Recording reminders

Describe what is visible. Record the observed condition, its location, extent and any associated evidence before attempting interpretation.

Avoid:

  • assuming cause without supporting evidence;
  • assuming structural performance from surface appearance;
  • assuming urgency without evidence of active loss or risk.

Prefer cautious language such as:

  • “observed”, “recorded”, “visible”
  • “consistent with”, “possible”, “may indicate”

Related tools

This atlas supports recognition and description only. It does not confirm causes, prescribe treatment, replace testing or replace specialist conservation advice. Where evidence is uncertain or risk is unclear, refer to qualified specialists.