Resources
Knowledge Tools

Defect Atlas — Brickwork & Masonry Units

A practical guide to recognising and describing common conditions and defects encountered on brickwork, gauged brick, fired clay masonry units and related unit-based heritage fabric during conservation surveys.

Using this volume

This volume of the Defect Atlas is a recognition and description aid for surveyors recording brickwork, gauged brick, fired clay masonry units and related unit-based heritage fabric. It supports consistent terminology and cautious observation, not diagnosis, treatment or specification.

The atlas helps users:

  • recognise common conditions encountered on brickwork and masonry units;
  • describe what is visible in clear, neutral language;
  • avoid unsupported diagnosis of cause, severity or urgency;
  • identify situations where specialist conservation, masonry or structural review may be appropriate.

The atlas does not:

  • confirm causes of deterioration or movement;
  • prescribe cleaning, repointing, replacement or consolidation;
  • replace material testing, monitoring or instrumented investigation;
  • replace specialist conservation, brickwork or structural engineering advice.
Where this sits

A practical survey resource, not a terminology reference

The Defect Atlas is part of Survey Resources — practical guides that support recording in the field. It is not part of the Reference Library, which holds curated terminology and material definitions, and it is separate from project-specific references held within individual projects.

Defect categories

Entries are grouped informally under the broad themes below. Many conditions span more than one theme; record what is observed rather than forcing a single category.

  • Unit deterioration (10)

    Loss of face, arris, profile or coherence of individual fired clay units, including erosion, spalling, flaking, delamination and friability.

  • Cracking and movement (7)

    Cracks through units and across courses, including hairline, open, stepped and through-unit fractures, with associated patterns of movement.

  • Moisture and salts (7)

    Visible indicators of moisture in brickwork and associated salt-related conditions, including efflorescence, subflorescence and tide marks.

  • Staining and deposits (6)

    Surface discolouration, soiling crusts and metallic staining originating from runoff, atmospheric exposure or adjacent components.

  • Biological growth (4)

    Colonisation by algae, lichen, moss and higher plants on or within brickwork, including root development at joints.

  • Manufacturing and firing features (4)

    Features arising from original manufacture and firing of the units, including over-firing, under-firing and pre-existing flaws visible in service.

  • Repair and replacement issues (5)

    Conditions associated with earlier interventions, including inappropriate replacement units, cementitious repairs, patching and visible incompatibility.

  • Joint and interface conditions (3)

    Conditions visible at the interface between unit and mortar, including hard mortar damage, open joints and failed bedding.

  • Structural displacement (4)

    Departures of brickwork from its intended plane or alignment, including bulging, leaning and movement around openings.

  • Environmental and impact damage (4)

    Damage associated with frost, fire, abrasion, impact and other external actions on brickwork.

Individual defect entries

54 entries. Use cautious language throughout: describe what is visible, and reserve interpretation for sections explicitly identified as such.

Unit deterioration

Surface erosion

Description

General loss of the original fired face of the brick across an area of the unit.

Typical appearance

Rounded, recessed or roughened face; loss of original tooling, texture or sharpness compared with adjacent units.

Possible contributing factors

Weathering exposure, retention of moisture and the original quality of the fired skin can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent across the unit and across the elevation
  • depth of loss relative to the original face where measurable
  • orientation and exposure of the affected area
  • whether sound units survive in sheltered locations nearby
Example observation wording

Surface erosion was recorded on bricks across the lower three courses of the south-west elevation, with the original fired face lost to a depth of approximately 3–5 mm.

Arris loss

Description

Rounding or loss of the sharp edges of bricks at their corners and exposed angles.

Typical appearance

Softened or chamfered edges, loss of original sharp arrises, sometimes with associated face erosion.

Possible contributing factors

Exposure, repeated wetting and drying, and mechanical contact can be associated; harder adjacent mortar may also be relevant.

Recording prompts
  • location of affected arrises within the elevation
  • approximate depth of arris loss
  • whether loss is confined to exposed edges or extends onto the face
  • condition of adjacent joints
Example observation wording

Arris loss was observed on bricks at the reveal of the first-floor window, with edges rounded by approximately 4 mm.

Spalling

Description

Detachment of a piece of the brick face, leaving a recessed area exposing the body of the unit.

Typical appearance

Discrete cavities with relatively fresh-looking exposed brick body; sometimes with detached fragments nearby.

Possible contributing factors

Frost action, salt crystallisation, harder pointing mortar or inherent weaknesses in the unit can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • number of spalled units and their distribution
  • approximate size and depth of the spalled area
  • whether the spall appears recent or weathered
  • presence of salts or moisture indicators nearby
Example observation wording

Spalling was recorded on five bricks within the parapet, with losses up to 30 mm across and 10 mm deep.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where spalling is extensive, progressive or associated with structural elements such as parapets, cornices or arches.

Flaking face

Description

Loss of thin layers from the fired face of the brick, often parallel to the surface.

Typical appearance

Thin detached or detaching scales of brick face; freshly exposed body visible beneath where loss has occurred.

Possible contributing factors

Moisture cycling, salt activity and inherent variation between the fired skin and underlying body can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent of flaking across the unit and the elevation
  • thickness of the detached layers where visible
  • whether flakes remain partly attached or have been lost
  • any concentration in a particular orientation or course
Example observation wording

Flaking face was recorded on bricks within the lower string course, with detached scales typically 1–3 mm thick.

Delamination

Description

Separation of the brick into layers parallel to the bed face, with loss of internal coherence.

Typical appearance

Visible internal laminations, gaps within the unit, sometimes with partial loss of the front layer leaving a stepped profile.

Possible contributing factors

Original manufacturing layering, prolonged moisture exposure and freeze–thaw action can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • number of affected units
  • depth and orientation of the laminations
  • whether laminations are tight or open
  • any associated cracking through the unit
Example observation wording

Delamination was observed in two bricks at the eaves, with the front 10 mm of each unit separated from the body.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where delamination affects load-bearing courses, projecting features or units at height.

Fretting

Description

Progressive granular loss from the brick surface producing a pitted or roughened texture.

Typical appearance

Pitted, roughened or honeycombed face; loose granular material may be visible at the foot of the wall.

Possible contributing factors

Soluble salt activity, repeated wetting and the original brick fabric can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and location of fretting
  • presence of granular debris at the base of the wall
  • association with any visible moisture or salt indicators
  • whether fretting is confined to one band of brickwork
Example observation wording

Fretting was recorded on bricks within the lowest five courses of the north elevation, with granular debris accumulated on the adjacent paving.

Powdering surface

Description

Fine, friable loss of brick material producing a dust-like residue from the face.

Typical appearance

Floury or chalky surface; dust transferred when lightly touched; subdued original texture.

Possible contributing factors

Salt crystallisation within the near-surface pores and prolonged dampness can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent of the affected area
  • whether powdering is uniform or patchy
  • evidence of associated salts or staining
  • relationship to moisture sources nearby
Example observation wording

A powdering surface was recorded on bricks behind a defective downpipe, with a light residue transferring when touched.

Friable brick

Description

Brick body that has lost coherence and crumbles readily when disturbed.

Typical appearance

Soft, easily damaged surface; loss of integrity through the depth of the unit where exposed.

Possible contributing factors

Sustained moisture exposure, salt activity and original under-firing can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • depth to which friability extends where assessable without intervention
  • number of units affected
  • any associated movement or loss of bedding
  • location relative to known damp pathways
Example observation wording

Friable brickwork was observed at the base of the boundary wall, with the surface crumbling on light handling.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where friability extends into structural courses or where stability appears to be affected.

Loss of decorative moulding

Description

Loss of profile to moulded, rubbed or shaped bricks forming decorative or architectural detail.

Typical appearance

Rounded, blurred or missing sections of moulded profile; loss of original crisp detailing compared with sheltered survivors.

Possible contributing factors

Weathering, freeze–thaw, soiling crusts and prior repairs can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • feature affected and its location
  • extent of loss along the moulding
  • comparison with surviving sound sections
  • any associated structural concerns
Example observation wording

Loss of decorative moulding was recorded along the brick cornice on the south elevation, with the projecting bullnose worn back by up to 8 mm.

Loss of gauged brick detail

Description

Loss of definition or fabric in gauged brickwork, including rubbed, cut or fine-jointed assemblies.

Typical appearance

Rounded arrises, opening of fine joints, partial loss of cut profiles, or detachment of gauged components.

Possible contributing factors

Weathering, soluble salts, incompatible repointing and historic cleaning can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of affected gauged work
  • whether loss affects the unit, the fine joint or both
  • presence of any earlier repairs to gauged components
  • comparison with sheltered surviving work
Example observation wording

Loss of gauged brick detail was recorded at the head of the principal door opening, with the lower arris of two voussoirs worn back by approximately 5 mm.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where gauged arches, cornices or finely cut details are affected, as repair requires specialist gauged brickwork knowledge.

Cracking and movement

Hairline cracking

Description

Very fine cracks through individual units or across joints, of limited width.

Typical appearance

Linear discontinuities visible on close inspection, typically less than 0.5 mm wide, sometimes following bedding planes.

Possible contributing factors

Shrinkage, thermal movement, minor settlement and inherent material features can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • length and orientation of cracks
  • whether cracks pass through units, joints or both
  • any associated displacement or staining
  • whether cracks appear isolated or part of a pattern
Example observation wording

Hairline cracking was recorded across three bricks above the ground-floor window, following a roughly vertical line.

Open cracking

Description

Cracks of significant width through units and joints, sufficient to admit debris or moisture.

Typical appearance

Visible separations more than approximately 1 mm wide, sometimes with associated displacement to one side.

Possible contributing factors

Structural movement, foundation settlement, thermal cycling and overload can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • maximum width and length of cracking
  • whether crack width varies along its length
  • evidence of associated displacement either side of the crack
  • presence of staining, vegetation or debris within the crack
Example observation wording

Open cracking was recorded on the north return, extending vertically from sill level for approximately 1.2 m and up to 3 mm wide at its widest point.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist structural review where open cracking is extensive, where it shows signs of recent movement, or where it crosses load-bearing elements.

Stepped cracking

Description

Cracking that follows the bedding and perpend joints in a stepped diagonal pattern.

Typical appearance

Diagonal crack tracing the line of bedding joints and stepping at perpends; may or may not extend through individual units.

Possible contributing factors

Differential settlement, movement at openings and foundation issues can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • direction and length of the stepped pattern
  • approximate width at intervals along the crack
  • relationship to openings, returns or interfaces
  • whether displacement is visible across the crack
Example observation wording

Stepped cracking was recorded on the south elevation, rising from the corner of the basement opening through six courses in a diagonal pattern.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist structural review where stepped cracking shows displacement across the crack, runs through load-bearing masonry or extends across multiple storeys.

Fracture through unit

Description

Cracking that passes directly through individual bricks rather than around them.

Typical appearance

Crack line crossing the face of one or more units, sometimes with offset between the two sides.

Possible contributing factors

Concentrated stress, overload, point loading and harder pointing mortar can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • number of units fractured
  • width of the fracture and any displacement
  • location relative to loads or fixings
  • whether the fracture extends through the depth of the unit where observable
Example observation wording

A fracture through unit was recorded at the springing of the brick arch, passing through two voussoirs.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist structural review where fractures pass through units in arches, lintels or other load-bearing assemblies.

Movement around openings

Description

Cracking, distortion or displacement concentrated around door, window or other openings in brickwork.

Typical appearance

Cracks radiating from opening corners, distorted reveals, displacement at heads or sills, or associated arch deformation.

Possible contributing factors

Lintel failure, settlement, thermal cycling and previous alterations can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • openings affected and their location on the elevation
  • type and extent of cracking observed
  • any associated distortion to reveals or sills
  • evidence of previous repairs nearby
Example observation wording

Movement around openings was recorded at the rear ground-floor window, with stepped cracking rising from both upper corners.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist structural review where movement around openings is associated with lintel distress or where load paths are unclear.

Cracking at lintel bearing

Description

Cracking concentrated at the bearings of lintels carrying brickwork above openings.

Typical appearance

Vertical or near-vertical cracking immediately above the end of the lintel, sometimes with associated displacement of bricks above.

Possible contributing factors

Lintel deflection, corrosion of embedded metal, inadequate bearing length or original construction defects can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • location and width of the cracking
  • any associated deflection of the lintel itself where visible
  • evidence of staining suggestive of embedded corrosion
  • condition of adjacent reveals
Example observation wording

Cracking at lintel bearing was recorded above the eastern entrance, extending vertically through three courses at the right-hand support.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist structural review where lintel cracking is accompanied by deflection, staining suggestive of corrosion or signs of progressive movement.

Manufacturing flaw visible in service

Description

Pre-existing manufacturing defects within units that have become more apparent in service, such as firing cracks.

Typical appearance

Linear cracks, voids or laminations within the unit consistent with manufacture rather than in-service movement.

Possible contributing factors

Original firing or shaping defects can be associated, sometimes opened up by weathering or stress.

Recording prompts
  • number of units affected and their distribution
  • character of the flaw compared with structural cracking
  • whether the flaw is opening over time where comparable evidence exists
  • any associated face loss
Example observation wording

A manufacturing flaw visible in service was recorded on a unit in the third course above ground, with a fine vertical line consistent with a firing crack.

Moisture and salts

Salt efflorescence

Description

Crystalline deposit of soluble salts on the brick surface or within joints.

Typical appearance

White, occasionally coloured, powdery or fluffy deposits on the face of bricks or mortar.

Possible contributing factors

Movement of soluble salts through brickwork during drying and the available moisture supply can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and distribution of efflorescence
  • concentration on units, joints or both
  • presence in particular bands or near identified moisture sources
  • whether deposits appear recent or long-standing
Example observation wording

Salt efflorescence was recorded on the lower courses of the chimney breast internally, as a white crystalline deposit on bricks and joints.

Subflorescence

Description

Salt crystallisation taking place within the brick body close to the surface rather than on it.

Typical appearance

Spalling, flaking or powdering of the surface with little or no visible deposit on the face; salts sometimes visible within voids.

Possible contributing factors

Soluble salts within the pore structure crystallising during drying can be associated, often with associated surface loss.

Recording prompts
  • type and extent of surface loss observed
  • presence of any salt deposit on adjacent surfaces or within cavities
  • relationship to known moisture pathways
  • comparison with adjacent unaffected units
Example observation wording

Subflorescence was indicated by localised flaking on bricks in the boundary wall, with no visible deposit on the face but salt crystals within the spalled cavities.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where subflorescence is suspected and surface loss is progressive, as remedial decisions typically require an understanding of salt and moisture regime.

Damp staining

Description

Darker discoloration of brickwork suggestive of current or past moisture content.

Typical appearance

Diffuse darker patches, sometimes with hard edges where the wall has dried unevenly, or with associated salt deposits.

Possible contributing factors

Rainwater, rising damp, leaks from rainwater goods or roofs, and condensation can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of staining
  • whether the area feels damp on inspection where reasonable to assess
  • association with rainwater paths, openings or service penetrations
  • any associated salts, biological growth or fabric loss
Example observation wording

Damp staining was recorded on the rear elevation below the gutter junction, with a darker patch extending across approximately 1.5 m of brickwork.

Tide marks

Description

Distinct horizontal lines on brickwork marking the upper limit of past moisture rise or saturation.

Typical appearance

Roughly horizontal banding with discolouration, salt deposits or staining concentrated along the line.

Possible contributing factors

Repeated cycles of wetting and drying, with salts deposited at the evaporation front, can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • height above ground or floor level of the tide mark
  • continuity of the mark across the elevation
  • associated salts, biological growth or surface deterioration
  • any related features such as defective ground drainage
Example observation wording

Tide marks were recorded on the internal face of the basement wall, with a band of salt-stained brickwork approximately 800 mm above floor level.

Water run-off staining

Description

Vertical stains on brickwork associated with rainwater wash from features above.

Typical appearance

Streaked staining running downward from sills, cornices, copings, fixings or defective rainwater goods.

Possible contributing factors

Lack of effective drips, blocked or leaking rainwater goods, and exposure of details to driven rain can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • source of the staining where identifiable
  • extent and direction of the streak
  • presence of any associated salts or biological growth
  • any related fabric deterioration
Example observation wording

Water run-off staining was observed below the projecting brick sill, with two darker streaks extending downward for approximately 600 mm.

Trapped moisture indicators

Description

Indirect signs that brickwork retains moisture for prolonged periods, such as persistent dampness, salts or biological growth.

Typical appearance

Combination of darker bricks, biological growth, salt deposits and surface deterioration concentrated in a specific area.

Possible contributing factors

Defective rainwater disposal, abutting impermeable finishes, ground contact and shaded orientation can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of the affected area
  • associated features such as planters, abutments or buried surfaces
  • evidence of seasonal variation where known
  • any related damage to adjacent fabric
Example observation wording

Trapped moisture indicators were recorded behind the abutting raised planting bed, with persistent biological growth and salt staining on the brickwork.

Salt-contaminated masonry

Description

Brickwork exhibiting evidence of significant soluble salt loading from a sustained source.

Typical appearance

Persistent and repeated efflorescence, subflorescence-related loss, repeated tide marks and accelerated decay.

Possible contributing factors

Ground salts, historic agricultural or industrial use, road salt and contaminated render or backing can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent of the affected zone and its height above ground
  • type and persistence of salt indicators observed
  • any identifiable source of contamination
  • whether deterioration appears progressive
Example observation wording

Salt-contaminated masonry was observed at the base of the agricultural building, with recurrent efflorescence and surface loss to a height of approximately 1 m.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where salt contamination is extensive, where deterioration is progressive or where the source of salts is not clear.

Staining and deposits

Iron staining

Description

Brown or orange staining of brickwork associated with iron compounds.

Typical appearance

Orange-brown to dark brown streaks or patches, often originating from a specific fixing, fitting or embedded metal element.

Possible contributing factors

Corrosion of embedded or adjacent ferrous components, iron-rich inclusions in the units, and rainwater transport can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • source of staining where identifiable
  • extent and direction of the stain
  • any associated cracking, displacement or efflorescence
  • whether the stain appears active or stable
Example observation wording

Iron staining was recorded beneath the wrought iron tie plate, extending downward in an orange-brown streak for approximately 400 mm.

Copper staining

Description

Green or blue-green staining of brickwork associated with copper compounds.

Typical appearance

Greenish vertical streaks or patches, typically running below copper roofing, flashings, fittings or fixings.

Possible contributing factors

Runoff from copper or copper-alloy components and atmospheric weathering of those metals can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • source above the stained area where identifiable
  • extent of the staining
  • whether it is concentrated on units, joints or both
  • any associated fabric deterioration
Example observation wording

Copper staining was observed below the copper flashing at the roof junction, with green streaks across three courses of brickwork.

Wall-tie or embedded metal staining

Description

Staining or distortion of brickwork associated with wall ties or other embedded ferrous components.

Typical appearance

Spots or streaks of rust-coloured staining at regular intervals, sometimes with associated cracking or lifting of bedding joints.

Possible contributing factors

Corrosion of embedded ties or anchors, sometimes with associated expansion and damage to surrounding fabric, can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • regularity and spacing of stained points
  • any associated cracking, lifting or displacement of bricks or joints
  • extent across the elevation
  • comparison with elevations of differing exposure
Example observation wording

Wall-tie or embedded metal staining was recorded at approximately 450 mm vertical centres on the gable, with associated hairline cracking at several joints.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where wall-tie staining is extensive or accompanied by cracking, displacement or lifting of bedding joints, as this can indicate progressive corrosion of embedded restraint components.

Black crust

Description

Hard, dark soiling deposit accumulated on sheltered brick surfaces.

Typical appearance

Black or dark grey crust adhering to the brick face, often in sheltered areas and on detailed mouldings.

Possible contributing factors

Long-term accumulation of atmospheric particulates and chemical interaction with the substrate can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and location of the crust
  • thickness where visible
  • evidence of any associated loss beneath the crust
  • any past cleaning attempts visible
Example observation wording

Black crust was recorded across the sheltered face of the cornice, with a continuous deposit on the underside.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review before any cleaning of black crusts, as removal can damage the underlying brick face.

Atmospheric soiling

Description

General darkening of brickwork from atmospheric particulates without forming a hard crust.

Typical appearance

Diffuse darkening of the brick face, typically more pronounced on sheltered orientations.

Possible contributing factors

Airborne particulates, traffic emissions and proximity to combustion sources can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and uniformity of soiling
  • differences between sheltered and exposed faces
  • any patches suggesting past cleaning
  • whether soiling obscures other conditions
Example observation wording

Atmospheric soiling was recorded across the principal elevation, with the brickwork notably darker on sheltered areas around the porch.

Algae staining

Description

Green or grey-green staining of brickwork associated with algal growth.

Typical appearance

Soft green or grey-green discolouration, often diffuse, on damp or shaded surfaces.

Possible contributing factors

Persistent surface moisture, shaded orientation and proximity to vegetation can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and orientation of the staining
  • association with damp areas or shaded surfaces
  • whether growth is active
  • any related runoff patterns
Example observation wording

Algae staining was recorded on the north elevation, with diffuse green discolouration across the lower bricks.

Biological growth

Lichen colonisation

Description

Establishment of lichens on brick faces, joints or projecting features.

Typical appearance

Crusty, leafy or branching growths in grey, white, yellow or orange colours on the brick surface.

Possible contributing factors

Air quality, exposure, moisture availability and the nature of the brick surface can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and species character where identifiable
  • concentration on particular faces or features
  • evidence of any associated fabric loss
  • comparison with adjacent unaffected areas
Example observation wording

Lichen colonisation was recorded across the upper courses of the parapet, with grey and yellow growths covering much of the brick face.

Moss growth at joints

Description

Development of moss within mortar joints and on horizontal brick surfaces.

Typical appearance

Green cushions or mats of moss in eroded joints, on copings or projecting features.

Possible contributing factors

Moisture retention, sheltered or shaded orientation and joint erosion can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of moss growth
  • associated joint erosion or moisture retention
  • whether growth appears active
  • any related drainage issues
Example observation wording

Moss growth at joints was recorded along the brick coping, with continuous cushions on the horizontal upper surface.

General biological growth

Description

Mixed colonisation of brickwork by algae, lichen, moss and minor plants.

Typical appearance

Combined surface darkening, patches of growth and developing vegetation on the brickwork.

Possible contributing factors

Moisture retention, sheltered orientation, atmospheric conditions and lack of regular maintenance can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • types of growth observed where distinguishable
  • extent across the elevation
  • association with damp or sheltered areas
  • any related fabric loss
Example observation wording

General biological growth was recorded on the north return, comprising algae, lichen and isolated moss patches across the lower courses.

Root growth at joints

Description

Roots of plants or self-seeded vegetation growing within mortar joints or behind brickwork.

Typical appearance

Visible roots emerging from joints, plants rooted into the wall, or joint displacement adjacent to vegetation.

Possible contributing factors

Self-seeded plants exploiting eroded joints, available moisture and lack of maintenance can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • type and size of vegetation where identifiable
  • extent of joint involvement
  • any associated displacement of bricks or joints
  • evidence of past attempts to remove vegetation
Example observation wording

Root growth at joints was recorded at the south-east corner, with a small buddleia rooted into the brickwork at high level and several joints opened around the base of the plant.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where significant vegetation is rooted into structural masonry, as removal may itself require careful management to limit further damage.

Manufacturing and firing features

Over-fired unit

Description

Bricks that have been subjected to greater heat in firing than typical units in the batch.

Typical appearance

Darker colour, often with vitrified or glassy surface, sometimes warped or distorted relative to other units.

Possible contributing factors

Variation within the kiln during original manufacture can be associated; in service these units often behave differently from their neighbours.

Recording prompts
  • number and distribution of over-fired units
  • their condition relative to other bricks
  • any associated cracking or distortion
  • their location within the wall
Example observation wording

Over-fired units were observed scattered through the elevation, with several displaying a vitrified darker face.

Under-fired unit

Description

Bricks that have been fired insufficiently in original manufacture and exhibit a softer, more porous body.

Typical appearance

Paler colour, softer face, sometimes with greater face loss or biological colonisation than adjacent units.

Possible contributing factors

Variation within the original firing can be associated; in service these units often weather more rapidly.

Recording prompts
  • number of under-fired units and their distribution
  • comparison with adjacent units in terms of erosion or staining
  • association with concentrated areas of deterioration
  • evidence of past selective replacement
Example observation wording

Under-fired units were recorded within the lower courses of the elevation, several displaying significantly greater erosion than adjacent bricks.

Visible firing crack

Description

Pre-existing crack within a unit dating from manufacture and visible in the wall.

Typical appearance

Linear discontinuity within a single unit, often following a characteristic firing pattern, not extending into adjacent units or joints.

Possible contributing factors

Original firing stresses or shaping defects can be associated; not necessarily indicative of in-service movement.

Recording prompts
  • number of units exhibiting the feature
  • whether the crack appears to be opening over time
  • associated face loss along the crack
  • comparison with structural cracking elsewhere
Example observation wording

A visible firing crack was recorded on a single unit in the third course, confined to the brick and not extending into adjacent joints.

Inclusions visible in service

Description

Pre-existing inclusions of foreign material within the brick body visible at the surface.

Typical appearance

Spots, voids or harder/softer areas within the face, sometimes associated with localised spalling or staining.

Possible contributing factors

Material variation in the original clay can be associated; some inclusions may expand or stain over time.

Recording prompts
  • extent and distribution of inclusions
  • any associated face loss or staining
  • comparison with the rest of the unit
  • whether progressive deterioration is suggested
Example observation wording

Inclusions visible in service were observed on bricks across the elevation, with one larger inclusion associated with a small spall on a single unit.

Repair and replacement issues

Inappropriate replacement brick

Description

Replacement units of differing material, fabric or performance from the surrounding historic brickwork.

Typical appearance

Visibly different colour, texture, size or weathering performance compared with the original bricks.

Possible contributing factors

Availability of matching units, cost considerations and lack of specification can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • number and distribution of replacement units
  • differences in colour, size and texture observed
  • any associated joint issues or differential weathering
  • evidence of further deterioration of the replacements or their neighbours
Example observation wording

Inappropriate replacement bricks were recorded in the southern bay, where machine-made units of differing colour have been inserted within a hand-made historic brickwork field.

Failed replacement unit

Description

Previously inserted replacement bricks now exhibiting their own deterioration.

Typical appearance

Spalling, flaking, erosion or cracking of bricks that are clearly later than the surrounding fabric.

Possible contributing factors

Mismatch in material performance, exposure conditions and original installation can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent of failure of replacement units
  • comparison with the condition of original neighbouring bricks
  • any associated joint or interface problems
  • evidence of multiple phases of intervention
Example observation wording

Failed replacement units were observed within the lower courses, several inserted bricks now exhibiting spalling exceeding that of the adjacent original units.

Cementitious repair

Description

Use of dense cement-based mortar or rendering material as a repair to brickwork.

Typical appearance

Grey, hard repair patches on units or in joints, often standing proud of, or differing markedly from, the original fabric.

Possible contributing factors

Earlier maintenance approaches and material availability can be associated; these repairs may behave differently from the original fabric.

Recording prompts
  • extent and location of cementitious repairs
  • any associated damage to adjacent original units
  • evidence of cracking, debonding or salt activity around the repairs
  • any obvious differences in moisture behaviour
Example observation wording

Cementitious repairs were recorded at the base of the chimney, comprising hard grey patches on several bricks with associated spalling at the edges of the repairs.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation review where cementitious repairs appear to be causing damage to surrounding historic fabric.

Patch repair

Description

Localised filling or building-up of damaged brick faces using mortar, brick-coloured repair material or other infill.

Typical appearance

Discrete patches on individual unit faces, of differing colour, texture and performance from the original brick.

Possible contributing factors

Earlier maintenance to address surface loss or spalling can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • number and distribution of patch repairs
  • condition of the patches and any debonding
  • any associated damage to host bricks
  • evidence of differential weathering between patch and host
Example observation wording

Patch repairs were recorded on several bricks within the parapet, with some patches partially detached at their edges.

Previous repair incompatibility

Description

Evidence that earlier repairs are interacting unfavourably with surrounding historic fabric.

Typical appearance

Concentrated deterioration of original units adjacent to repairs, cracking at the interface or moisture retention behind repairs.

Possible contributing factors

Differences in porosity, strength and moisture behaviour between repair and original can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • location of repairs showing apparent incompatibility
  • type of deterioration in adjacent original units
  • any signs of moisture being concentrated by the repairs
  • comparison with similar units away from repair areas
Example observation wording

Previous repair incompatibility was suggested by concentrated spalling of original bricks immediately around several earlier cementitious patches.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where earlier repairs appear to be contributing to deterioration of original fabric, as removal and replacement may itself require careful planning.

Joint and interface conditions

Hard mortar damage to brick arrises

Description

Loss of brick arrises associated with the presence of a harder pointing mortar than the surrounding units.

Typical appearance

Eroded brick edges adjacent to relatively sound, proud mortar joints; sometimes with spalling concentrated at arrises.

Possible contributing factors

Use of a pointing mortar harder than the brick, restricting moisture release through the joint, can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent of arris loss across the elevation
  • comparison with areas of softer or lime-based pointing
  • any associated face loss beyond the arrises
  • evidence of repointing using cementitious mortar
Example observation wording

Hard mortar damage to brick arrises was recorded across the elevation where cementitious repointing has been carried out, with consistent loss of arrises adjacent to the proud joints.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where hard mortar damage is extensive, as remedial repointing decisions typically require an understanding of the existing materials and exposure regime.

Open joints at brick interface

Description

Visible separation between brick units and mortar joints, allowing ingress of water or debris.

Typical appearance

Linear gaps along the perimeter of bricks where they meet the joint, sometimes accompanied by mortar loss.

Possible contributing factors

Differential movement, mortar shrinkage, freeze–thaw and earlier repointing failure can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and continuity of open joints
  • approximate width of the gap
  • associated mortar loss or damage to brick
  • any pattern related to orientation or exposure
Example observation wording

Open joints at brick interface were recorded across the upper courses of the gable, with continuous gaps of approximately 1–2 mm at the underside of bricks in several courses.

Failed bedding

Description

Loss or significant deterioration of the bedding mortar between brick courses.

Typical appearance

Voids, deep recessing or absence of mortar between courses, sometimes with associated movement of bricks.

Possible contributing factors

Long-term mortar deterioration, salt action, water infiltration and historic repointing limited to the face can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • depth and extent of bedding loss where visible
  • any associated movement or settlement of bricks
  • evidence of historic face-only repointing concealing deeper loss
  • location relative to known moisture sources
Example observation wording

Failed bedding was indicated at the parapet, where probing of recessed joints suggested mortar loss to a depth of more than 50 mm in places.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist structural review where failed bedding is suspected through significant depth of the wall or where associated movement is observed.

Structural displacement

Bulging masonry

Description

Out-of-plane deformation of brickwork producing a visible convex face.

Typical appearance

Curved or distorted brickwork visible when sighted along the wall, sometimes with associated cracking.

Possible contributing factors

Failure of internal bonding, wall-tie corrosion, embedded timber decay and overload can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and location of the bulge
  • approximate displacement at its maximum
  • any associated cracking or open joints
  • evidence of past attempts at restraint
Example observation wording

Bulging masonry was recorded in the central bay of the south elevation, with a visible bulge of approximately 30 mm at its maximum.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist structural review where bulging is significant, where cracking or movement appear active, or where it occurs in load-bearing or high-level brickwork.

Leaning masonry

Description

Brickwork that has departed from the vertical across its full height.

Typical appearance

Wall, parapet or chimney visibly out of plumb when assessed against an adjacent vertical reference.

Possible contributing factors

Foundation movement, lateral loading, alterations and historic damage can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • element affected and its location
  • approximate departure from vertical
  • any associated cracking, displacement or distress at junctions
  • evidence of past remedial work
Example observation wording

Leaning masonry was recorded at the upper section of the chimney, with the stack visibly inclined to the east when sighted from the ground.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist structural review where leaning is significant, where it affects high-level or freestanding masonry, or where there is evidence of progressive movement.

Displacement of individual units

Description

Movement of single bricks out of their original alignment within the wall plane.

Typical appearance

Bricks projecting from or recessed below the wall face; open joints around displaced units.

Possible contributing factors

Failure of bedding mortar, frost action, impact and corrosion of adjacent fixings can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • number and location of displaced units
  • extent of displacement at each location
  • any associated cracking or joint loss
  • stability of the displaced units
Example observation wording

Displacement of individual units was recorded at high level on the gable, with one brick projecting approximately 10 mm from the wall face.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where displaced units are at height, are insecure or are within load-bearing assemblies.

Fracture across multiple courses

Description

Cracking extending continuously across many courses, often associated with significant movement.

Typical appearance

Long, sometimes wandering cracks crossing units and joints over several metres, with possible displacement across the line.

Possible contributing factors

Foundation settlement, removal of restraint, lateral loading and major thermal events can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • total length and width of cracking
  • any displacement across the fracture
  • relationship to openings, junctions and supports
  • evidence of monitoring or past repair
Example observation wording

A fracture across multiple courses was recorded on the rear elevation, extending vertically over five storeys from ground to eaves.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist structural review where fractures cross multiple courses, where there is displacement across the crack or where movement may be active.

Environmental and impact damage

Frost-related surface loss

Description

Loss of brick face attributable to repeated freezing and thawing of retained moisture.

Typical appearance

Spalling, flaking and surface granular loss, often concentrated on saturated or exposed faces.

Possible contributing factors

Sustained moisture retention combined with freeze–thaw cycling and the original frost resistance of the units can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • location and orientation of affected areas
  • extent and depth of loss
  • association with moisture pathways or copings
  • comparison with sheltered units
Example observation wording

Frost-related surface loss was recorded on the upper courses of the freestanding wall, with spalling concentrated below the inadequately weathered coping.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where frost-related loss is extensive, progressive or affects copings, parapets and other exposed elements.

Fire-related alteration

Description

Changes to the brickwork associated with past exposure to fire.

Typical appearance

Discolouration, calcination, spalling, fissuring or fused surfaces, often concentrated within a specific area.

Possible contributing factors

Past fire events, intense or prolonged heating and rapid cooling can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent of the affected area
  • type and pattern of alteration observed
  • any associated structural concerns
  • evidence of past repair following the event
Example observation wording

Fire-related alteration was recorded in the corner of the warehouse, with bricks displaying calcined faces and surface spalling across approximately 2 m².

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist structural and conservation review where fire-related alteration is suspected, as the underlying strength and stability of affected fabric may require investigation.

Abrasion

Description

Loss of brick face from repeated mechanical contact such as use, traffic or cleaning.

Typical appearance

Smoothed, worn or grooved surfaces, often at predictable locations such as door reveals, low-level corners and steps.

Possible contributing factors

Use, vehicle or trolley contact, cleaning regimes and accumulated handling can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • location and pattern of wear
  • extent of material loss where measurable
  • associated damage to arrises or features
  • evidence of cumulative impact
Example observation wording

Abrasion was recorded at the entrance reveal, with rounded arrises and a polished worn area extending approximately 1 m above the threshold.

Impact damage

Description

Localised damage from a discrete impact event to brickwork.

Typical appearance

Cracking, chipping, displacement or loss of one or more units in a localised area, with relatively fresh edges where recent.

Possible contributing factors

Vehicle contact, falling debris, construction activity and vandalism can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of damage
  • number of units affected
  • any associated cracking extending beyond the impact zone
  • evidence of associated displacement
Example observation wording

Impact damage was recorded at the base of the gatepost, with two bricks broken and partially displaced, consistent with vehicle contact.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist structural review where impact damage affects load-bearing elements or where associated cracking extends beyond the immediate area of impact.

Recording reminders

Describe what is visible. Record the observed condition, its location, extent and any associated evidence before attempting interpretation.

Avoid:

  • diagnosing the source of damp or salt activity from surface appearance alone;
  • assuming structural significance from surface conditions without supporting evidence;
  • describing treatment in a survey observation rather than in a separate recommendation.

Prefer cautious language such as:

  • “observed”, “recorded”, “visible”;
  • “may indicate”, “can be associated with”, “consistent with”;
  • “record whether…”, “consider specialist review where…”.
Specialist review

When to consider specialist review

Many conditions in this volume — including extensive cracking, stepped cracking across openings, bulging or leaning brickwork, suspected wall-tie corrosion, significant frost-related loss, persistent salt activity, fire-altered fabric, failed gauged brickwork and damage associated with hard cementitious repairs — warrant qualified conservation, masonry or structural advice before any cleaning, repointing, replacement or consolidation is contemplated. The Responsible Commissioning Guide offers further prompts for determining when specialist review, monitoring or investigation may be appropriate.

Other Defect Atlas volumes

The Defect Atlas currently includes volumes for architectural metalwork, stone, timber, stained glass, paintings, textiles, ceramics & terracotta, plaster, render & stucco, mortars, pointing & joints, roofing & rainwater goods, and brickwork & masonry units. Further volumes may follow.

Related tools

Related Atlas volumes

Other Defect Atlas volumes — open a sibling area within Masonry & stone or browse across the wider atlas programme.

This atlas supports recognition and description only. It does not confirm causes, prescribe treatment, replace material testing or instrumented investigation, and does not replace specialist conservation, masonry or structural advice. Where evidence is uncertain, where movement or loss appears active, or where risk to fabric or people is unclear, refer observations to qualified conservators, brickwork specialists or structural engineers before any cleaning, repair or replacement is contemplated.