Resources
Knowledge Tools

Defect Atlas — Decorative Finishes & Coatings

A practical guide to recognising and describing common conditions and defects encountered on historic decorative finishes and coatings — including architectural paint systems, limewash, distemper, varnishes and clear coatings, gilding, painted inscriptions and decorative schemes — during conservation surveys.

Using this volume

This volume of the Defect Atlas is a recognition and description aid for surveyors recording historic decorative finishes and coatings — including architectural paint systems, limewash, distemper, varnishes and clear coatings, gilding, painted inscriptions and applied decorative schemes. It supports consistent terminology and cautious observation, not diagnosis, treatment or specification.

The composition, layer sequence, age and significance of historic coatings cannot be confirmed from visual observation alone. Where this volume describes such conditions it does so as visual indicators that may be associated with particular processes or histories; confirmation requires paint analysis, sampling or documentary research.

The atlas helps users:

  • recognise common conditions encountered on historic decorative finishes;
  • describe what is visible in clear, neutral language;
  • avoid unsupported diagnosis of cause, age or significance;
  • identify situations where specialist paint, polychromy, gilding or decorative conservation review may be appropriate.

The atlas does not:

  • confirm causes of coating failure, staining or loss;
  • confirm the age, composition or significance of a scheme;
  • prescribe cleaning, consolidation, retouching, overpainting or stripping;
  • replace paint analysis, sampling or documentary investigation;
  • replace specialist paint, polychromy, gilding or decorative conservation advice.
Where this sits

A practical survey resource, not a terminology reference

The Defect Atlas is part of Survey Resources — practical guides that support recording in the field. It is not part of the Reference Library, which holds curated terminology and material definitions, and it is separate from project-specific references held within individual projects.

Defect categories

Entries are grouped informally under the broad themes below. Many conditions span more than one theme; record what is observed rather than forcing a single category.

  • Paint layer failure (7)

    Loss of integrity within a paint film, including flaking, peeling, blistering, cracking, alligatoring, powdering and chalking of architectural paint systems.

  • Limewash and distemper issues (4)

    Conditions specific to traditional water-based finishes — limewash and soft distempers — including friability, loss, powdering and characteristic staining.

  • Varnish and clear coating issues (5)

    Conditions affecting varnishes, lacquers and clear protective coatings, including yellowing, bloom, cracking, blanching and loss.

  • Decorative scheme loss (7)

    Loss or disruption of decorative content, including gilding, stencilled work, painted inscriptions, graining, marbling and other applied decorative schemes.

  • Moisture and salts (5)

    Conditions associated with water movement and salt activity at, through or beneath decorative finishes, including damp staining, tide marks, run-off and salt efflorescence through coatings.

  • Staining and soiling (6)

    Surface accumulations and discolouration on or within decorative finishes, including atmospheric soiling, ingrained dirt, soot deposits and biological growth.

  • Adhesion and cohesion failure (3)

    Loss of bond between coating and substrate, between coating layers, or within a single coating layer.

  • Previous overpainting and intervention (5)

    Evidence of earlier coating campaigns, overpainting, incompatible modern paints, failed redecoration and other historic interventions affecting the current surface.

  • Surface deposits and residues (5)

    Material accumulated on or in the surface from sources other than soiling, including wax, adhesive residue, accretions, cleaning test marks and overcleaning indicators.

  • Environmental and handling damage (6)

    Physical, light, thermal and use-related effects on decorative surfaces, including abrasion, scuffing, impact, fading, colour shift, heat damage and condensation marking.

Individual defect entries

53 entries. Use cautious language throughout: describe what is visible, and reserve interpretation for sections explicitly identified as such.

Paint layer failure

Flaking paint

Description

Detachment of small fragments of paint film from the substrate or from an underlying paint layer.

Typical appearance

Lifted, curled or detached flakes across part of a surface; sometimes with cupped or tented edges; exposed substrate or earlier paint visible at losses.

Possible contributing factors

Loss of adhesion to substrate or underlying coating, moisture movement and incompatibility between layers can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and distribution of flaking
  • approximate size of typical flakes
  • whether flakes appear actively lifting or stable
  • character of the exposed surface beneath
Example observation wording

Flaking paint was recorded across the lower 600 mm of the panel, with curled flakes up to approximately 10 mm across exposing an earlier paint layer beneath.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist paint conservation advice where flaking affects a decorative scheme of possible historic or artistic significance, or where loss appears active.

Peeling paint

Description

Detachment of paint in larger sheets or strips rather than discrete flakes.

Typical appearance

Lifted sheets or ribbons of paint film, sometimes retaining several layers; exposed substrate or earlier scheme visible at losses.

Possible contributing factors

Loss of adhesion across an extended area, moisture between layers and applications over poorly prepared surfaces can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and pattern of peeling
  • approximate size of detached areas
  • number of layers visible in the detached film
  • any evidence of moisture beneath the peeled area
Example observation wording

Peeling paint was recorded across the sheltered face of the door, with sheets up to approximately 80 mm across lifting from the substrate and revealing two earlier paint layers.

Blistering paint

Description

Raised bubbles within the paint film, indicating localised loss of adhesion.

Typical appearance

Domed or raised areas in the paint film, intact or broken, sometimes containing moisture or staining.

Possible contributing factors

Moisture beneath the coating, application over contaminated surfaces and incompatible layers can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • size and distribution of blisters
  • whether blisters appear intact or broken
  • presence of moisture or staining at broken blisters
  • underlying surface where exposed
Example observation wording

Blistering paint was recorded on the south-facing rail, with intact blisters up to approximately 5 mm across distributed across the upper face.

Cracking paint film

Description

Linear discontinuities through one or more layers of the paint film.

Typical appearance

Fine to wide cracks, sometimes following the grain of the substrate, sometimes through several layers; cracks may be straight, branching or directional.

Possible contributing factors

Ageing of the paint film, movement of the substrate and applications of brittle coatings over more flexible layers can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • pattern, orientation and approximate width of cracks
  • whether cracks pass through the full thickness of the film
  • association with substrate features such as joints or grain
  • any evidence of associated lift along crack edges
Example observation wording

Cracking of the paint film was recorded across the architrave, with fine cracks broadly aligned with the grain of the underlying timber.

Alligatoring

Description

A pattern of wide, interconnecting cracks giving the paint film an appearance similar to alligator skin.

Typical appearance

Broad polygonal cracks dividing the surface into discrete islands, sometimes with raised edges and visible underlying layers between islands.

Possible contributing factors

Differential movement between an aged upper layer and an underlying layer of differing flexibility, and applications over incompatible or insufficiently cured coatings, can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and scale of the alligatored pattern
  • depth of cracks where visible
  • character of any underlying layer exposed between islands
  • association with particular orientations or exposures
Example observation wording

Alligatoring was recorded on the door panel, with broad polygonal cracks dividing the surface into raised islands up to approximately 30 mm across.

Powdering paint

Description

Loss of cohesion within a paint film resulting in powdery surface material.

Typical appearance

Soft, dusty or chalk-like surface that marks easily on light touch; sometimes with associated loss of colour intensity.

Possible contributing factors

Binder breakdown, weathering and moisture exposure can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent of powdering
  • whether the surface marks on light contact
  • any associated loss of original colour
  • comparison between exposed and sheltered areas
Example observation wording

Powdering of the paint film was recorded across the upper sections of the panel, with surface material transferring readily to a gloved fingertip on light contact.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist paint conservation advice where powdering affects a scheme of possible historic significance, as cohesion loss can complicate consolidation decisions.

Chalking

Description

Formation of a fine, loose powder on the surface of a weathered paint film.

Typical appearance

Pale, dusty bloom on the surface that transfers readily to a finger; sometimes with associated dulling of colour and gloss.

Possible contributing factors

UV exposure, binder degradation and long-term weathering of exterior paints can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent of chalking across the element
  • association with sun-exposed orientations
  • transfer of powder to a light wipe
  • any associated loss of gloss or colour
Example observation wording

Chalking was recorded across the south elevation, with a fine pale bloom on the painted boards transferring readily to a light wipe.

Limewash and distemper issues

Friable limewash

Description

A limewash layer that has lost cohesion and breaks or powders readily on light contact.

Typical appearance

Soft, granular or dusty limewash surface; pale powder visible on adjacent surfaces or on a light wipe.

Possible contributing factors

Weathering, repeated wetting and drying, and original application conditions can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and location of friable areas
  • thickness of limewash where visible at losses
  • presence of powder on adjacent fabric
  • association with exposure or shelter patterns
Example observation wording

Friable limewash was recorded across the exposed face of the wall, with surface material readily transferring to a light wipe in the upper third.

Limewash loss

Description

Areas where the limewash layer has been lost from the substrate, exposing earlier limewash or the underlying surface.

Typical appearance

Patches of paler or differently coloured surface where the most recent limewash is missing; sometimes with visible layer edges at the perimeter of losses.

Possible contributing factors

Weathering, water run-off, abrasion, salt activity and earlier cleaning campaigns can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent, location and pattern of loss
  • number of layers visible at losses
  • character of the exposed surface beneath
  • association with run-off pathways or accessible heights
Example observation wording

Limewash loss was recorded along the splash zone of the wall, with the most recent layer absent across an area approximately 1.2 m long and exposing earlier ochre limewash beneath.

Distemper powdering

Description

Powdering or loss of cohesion of a soft distemper layer.

Typical appearance

Powdery or dusty surface that marks readily on contact; sometimes with associated colour loss; transfer of pigment visible on adjacent fabric or fittings.

Possible contributing factors

Inherent characteristics of soft distemper, ageing, moisture exposure and abrasion can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent of powdering
  • transfer of pigment on light contact
  • association with accessible or handled areas
  • any visible loss of colour or detail
Example observation wording

Distemper powdering was recorded across the ceiling surface, with pigment transferring readily on light contact and a fine dusting visible on the cornice below.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation advice before any cleaning of historic distempers, which are inherently friable and sensitive to water and abrasion.

Distemper staining

Description

Discolouration or marking within a distemper surface that disrupts the visual continuity of the finish.

Typical appearance

Darker patches, tide marks, streaks or localised discoloured areas within the distemper field; sometimes with associated salt or moisture indicators.

Possible contributing factors

Moisture movement, salt activity, leaks, dust accumulation and earlier overpainting can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent, shape and intensity of staining
  • location relative to potential moisture or salt sources
  • any associated tide marks or salt deposits
  • whether the staining appears stable or recent
Example observation wording

Distemper staining was recorded across the ceiling adjacent to the chimney breast, with a darker patch approximately 400 mm across and a faint tide mark at its lower edge.

Varnish and clear coating issues

Varnish yellowing

Description

Darkening or yellow-brown discolouration of a clear or pigmented varnish layer.

Typical appearance

Yellow to brown cast over the underlying surface; sometimes more pronounced in sheltered areas or where the original varnish remains intact.

Possible contributing factors

Ageing of natural resin varnishes, UV exposure and oxidation can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and intensity of yellowing
  • uniformity across the surface or concentration in particular areas
  • association with sheltered or exposed orientations
  • effect of yellowing on legibility of underlying decoration
Example observation wording

Varnish yellowing was recorded across the panel, with a uniform yellow-brown cast obscuring the original colour balance of the painted scheme beneath.

Varnish bloom

Description

A milky or hazy bloom on the surface of a varnish layer.

Typical appearance

Pale, cloudy or whitish haze obscuring the gloss and clarity of the varnish; sometimes patchy, sometimes general.

Possible contributing factors

Moisture exposure, condensation history and ageing of the varnish film can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and distribution of bloom
  • intensity and uniformity
  • association with locations of moisture exposure or condensation
  • effect on visibility of underlying decoration
Example observation wording

Varnish bloom was recorded across the lower section of the panel, with a milky haze partially obscuring the underlying paint layer.

Varnish cracking

Description

Cracking through a varnish layer, sometimes in characteristic patterns.

Typical appearance

Network of fine cracks across the varnish surface, sometimes following an aged craquelure pattern; underlying paint may or may not be affected.

Possible contributing factors

Ageing of natural resins, movement of the substrate and differential response between varnish and paint can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • pattern and density of cracking
  • whether cracks pass through varnish only or also through paint layers
  • any associated lift along crack edges
  • extent across the element
Example observation wording

Varnish cracking was recorded across the panel face, with a fine network of cracks confined to the upper coating and not visibly extending into the paint beneath.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist paintings or polychromy conservation advice where varnish cracking is associated with a decorative scheme of historic or artistic significance.

Varnish loss

Description

Loss of varnish from part of the surface, exposing the underlying paint or substrate.

Typical appearance

Patches where the varnish layer is missing or thinned, often with sharper colour or duller surface beneath; sometimes with visible varnish edges around the loss.

Possible contributing factors

Abrasion, earlier cleaning, solvent action and weathering can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent, shape and location of loss
  • character of the exposed surface
  • evidence of associated handling, cleaning or wear
  • comparison with adjacent areas where varnish is intact
Example observation wording

Varnish loss was recorded around the handle, with a worn area approximately 60 mm across exposing the underlying painted surface.

Clear coating blanching

Description

Localised pale, opaque areas within a clear coating, often associated with moisture or solvent exposure.

Typical appearance

Whitish or grey-white patches within the clear film; sometimes with diffuse edges; underlying decoration partially obscured.

Possible contributing factors

Moisture contact, condensation, solvent exposure and earlier cleaning can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and shape of blanched areas
  • association with locations of past wetting or cleaning
  • whether the blanching appears uniform or patchy
  • effect on visibility of underlying decoration
Example observation wording

Clear coating blanching was recorded along the lower edge of the panel, with a band of whitish opacity approximately 40 mm wide consistent with past wetting.

Decorative scheme loss

Decorative scheme loss

Description

Loss of part of an applied decorative scheme, including coloured fields, borders and figured elements.

Typical appearance

Areas where the decorative layer is absent, exposing an earlier scheme, ground or substrate; sometimes with surviving scheme remnants at the edges.

Possible contributing factors

Past overpainting and stripping, water damage, abrasion and earlier interventions can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and pattern of loss
  • evidence of original scheme at edges and in protected areas
  • character of the exposed surface beneath
  • presence of any preparatory drawing or layout lines
Example observation wording

Decorative scheme loss was recorded across the upper field of the wall, with the original stencilled border surviving only at the corners and a plain ground exposed across the body of the area.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist decorative or polychromy conservation advice where loss affects a scheme of possible historic or artistic significance, particularly before any cleaning or strip back is contemplated.

Loss of gilding

Description

Loss of gilded surface from a gilded element, exposing bole, gesso, ground or substrate.

Typical appearance

Patches where gold leaf or applied gilding is absent; underlying red, yellow, ochre or white bole or ground often visible; sometimes with surviving gilding at protected edges.

Possible contributing factors

Abrasion, water damage, earlier cleaning and ageing of adhesive layers can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and location of loss
  • character of the exposed underlying layer
  • presence of surviving gilding in protected areas
  • any evidence of earlier in-fill or regilding
Example observation wording

Loss of gilding was recorded across the cornice mouldings, with red bole exposed across the upper face and surviving gilding confined to the recesses.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist gilding conservation advice for any significant gilded scheme before any cleaning, in-fill or regilding is contemplated.

Gilding abrasion

Description

Wear and thinning of a gilded surface without complete loss.

Typical appearance

Polished or worn areas of gilding with reduced lustre, sometimes with the ground showing faintly through; concentrated at handled or exposed points.

Possible contributing factors

Use, handling, dusting and earlier cleaning can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and location of abrasion
  • concentration at handling points or exposed surfaces
  • comparison with protected areas
  • evidence of earlier touch-up
Example observation wording

Gilding abrasion was recorded across the front face of the handle, with the underlying bole showing faintly through a worn area approximately 50 mm long.

Loss of stencil detail

Description

Loss or fading of stencilled decorative detail within an applied scheme.

Typical appearance

Incomplete or interrupted stencilled motifs; faint outlines where the figure has been partially lost; sometimes with surviving complete motifs in protected areas.

Possible contributing factors

Abrasion, water damage, overpainting and earlier cleaning can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent of stencil loss across the scheme
  • completeness of representative motifs
  • evidence of layout or registration marks
  • any surviving complete motifs in protected positions
Example observation wording

Loss of stencil detail was recorded across the dado, with the border motif legible only in fragments and complete examples surviving behind the radiator.

Loss of painted inscription

Description

Loss or partial loss of a painted inscription, lettering scheme or commemorative text.

Typical appearance

Incomplete or partially legible letters; ghost outlines where the paint has been thinned or lost; sometimes with surviving complete words in protected areas.

Possible contributing factors

Weathering, abrasion, earlier cleaning and overpainting can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent of the inscription remaining
  • legibility of representative letters or words
  • presence of any ghost outline assisting reconstruction
  • any associated photographic or documentary record
Example observation wording

Loss of painted inscription was recorded across the lower line of the panel, with the first three words legible and the remainder visible only as a faint ghost outline.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation advice before any cleaning or attempt to recover painted inscriptions, as residual evidence is easily destroyed by intervention.

Loss of graining or marbling effect

Description

Loss or disruption of decorative graining, marbling or other imitative finishes.

Typical appearance

Areas where the imitative figure is missing, thinned or interrupted; underlying ground colour often visible; sometimes with surviving figure in protected areas.

Possible contributing factors

Abrasion, earlier cleaning and overpainting can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and pattern of loss
  • character of the underlying ground
  • comparison with protected sections retaining the original figure
  • evidence of earlier touch-up or rework
Example observation wording

Loss of graining was recorded on the door panel, with the figured upper coat thinned across the central field and the buff ground showing through.

Abrasion at handling point

Description

Loss of decoration concentrated at points of regular use or handling.

Typical appearance

Worn, thinned or lost decoration at handles, edges, thresholds and other contact zones; sometimes with concentric or directional wear pattern.

Possible contributing factors

Use, handling, cleaning and friction can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of worn areas
  • depth of loss into the coating sequence
  • evidence of earlier in-fill or repainting at the worn area
  • comparison with adjacent, less-handled surfaces
Example observation wording

Abrasion at the handling point was recorded around the door knob, with concentric wear across an area approximately 120 mm in diameter exposing two earlier paint layers.

Moisture and salts

Damp staining

Description

Discoloured areas within or beneath a coating that may be associated with moisture movement through the fabric.

Typical appearance

Darker patches, brown or yellow staining, sometimes with diffuse edges or pronounced outlines; concentrated at known moisture sources.

Possible contributing factors

Rainwater penetration, plumbing leaks, condensation and rising moisture can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent, shape and location of staining
  • association with potential moisture sources
  • whether the staining appears active or historic
  • any associated salt deposits or coating failure
Example observation wording

Damp staining was recorded on the wall adjacent to the rainwater pipe, with a brown discoloration approximately 300 mm across and diffuse edges.

Tide mark

Description

A distinct horizontal line marking the upper limit of moisture rise within a coating or substrate.

Typical appearance

Sharp or diffuse linear band, often darker above or below, sometimes with associated salt deposits or coating failure along the line.

Possible contributing factors

Rising moisture, evaporation patterns and salt deposition at the drying front can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • location and approximate height of the tide mark
  • sharpness or diffuseness of the line
  • presence of salt deposits at the line
  • extent along the wall
Example observation wording

A tide mark was recorded at approximately 350 mm above floor level, with a faint band of salt deposits along the line and powdering of the limewash above.

Water run-off staining

Description

Linear staining on a coated surface associated with rainwater run-off pathways.

Typical appearance

Vertical or diagonal streaks below cills, projections or leak points; sometimes darker, sometimes paler than the surrounding surface.

Possible contributing factors

Rainwater run-off concentration, blocked drainage and detail design can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • location, length and direction of streaks
  • source above the staining where identifiable
  • association with detailing or blockage
  • any coating breakdown along the run-off pathway
Example observation wording

Water run-off staining was recorded below the cill, with three vertical streaks extending approximately 800 mm down the painted render.

Salt efflorescence through coating

Description

White, crystalline salt deposits emerging through or beneath a coating.

Typical appearance

White fluffy, powdery or crystalline deposits on the coating surface; sometimes with associated disruption of the paint film around the deposit.

Possible contributing factors

Soluble salts mobilised through the substrate by moisture movement can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and distribution of efflorescence
  • association with moisture sources or drying patterns
  • presence of associated coating failure
  • whether deposits appear active or historic
Example observation wording

Salt efflorescence through the coating was recorded across the lower wall, with white crystalline deposits emerging at several points and associated flaking of the paint film.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation or materials advice where salt activity is recurring or appears to be driving ongoing coating failure, as moisture and salt sources may need to be addressed before any redecoration.

Condensation marking

Description

Surface marks associated with repeated condensation on a coated surface.

Typical appearance

Run marks, mottled darkening, mould spotting or pale haze on cold faces or in poorly ventilated areas.

Possible contributing factors

Cold surfaces, high humidity, poor ventilation and use patterns can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and pattern of marking
  • association with cold faces or upper corners
  • presence of mould spotting at affected areas
  • any reported pattern of condensation in the space
Example observation wording

Condensation marking was recorded across the upper corners of the room, with mottled darkening and isolated mould spotting on the cooler external angles.

Staining and soiling

Surface soiling

Description

Loose surface accumulation of dust and particulates on a coated surface.

Typical appearance

Even or patchy darkening of the surface that may lift on light contact; concentrated on horizontal or sheltered faces.

Possible contributing factors

Atmospheric particulates, indoor dust generation, ventilation patterns and cleaning history can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and distribution of soiling
  • concentration on particular orientations or details
  • whether the deposit lifts on light contact
  • comparison with cleaned or protected areas
Example observation wording

Surface soiling was recorded across the moulded cornice, with darker dust accumulation on the upper faces and minimal accumulation on the soffit.

Ingrained dirt

Description

Dirt that has become embedded within the surface and no longer lifts on light contact.

Typical appearance

Persistent darkening, sometimes following surface texture; not removable on light wiping; sometimes more pronounced in recesses and tooled detail.

Possible contributing factors

Prolonged exposure, surface texture, binder breakdown and earlier incomplete cleaning can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and pattern of ingrained soiling
  • concentration in tooled detail or recesses
  • comparison with protected areas
  • evidence of earlier cleaning campaigns
Example observation wording

Ingrained dirt was recorded across the carved frieze, with persistent darkening in the recesses of the moulding and partial removal evident on the prominent faces.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation advice before any cleaning of ingrained soiling on schemes of possible historic or artistic significance, as cleaning methods can affect underlying decoration.

Atmospheric soiling

Description

Soiling associated with atmospheric pollution accumulated over extended periods.

Typical appearance

Dark deposits, sometimes as discrete crusts, sometimes as general darkening; concentrated on sheltered exterior surfaces.

Possible contributing factors

Local and historic air quality, exposure history, surface texture and cleaning history can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and intensity of soiling
  • concentration in sheltered zones
  • presence of discrete crusts versus general darkening
  • comparison between sheltered and washed surfaces
Example observation wording

Atmospheric soiling was recorded across the painted external elevation, with darker crusts concentrated beneath the cill and paler washed areas across the exposed face.

Soot deposit

Description

Black or dark grey deposit on a coated surface associated with combustion sources.

Typical appearance

Black or dark grey film or build-up, sometimes concentrated above fireplaces, flues or candle positions; sometimes as discrete linear marks.

Possible contributing factors

Past or present combustion, flue performance, candle use and ventilation can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and location of soot deposits
  • association with fireplaces, flues, candle positions or vents
  • intensity and thickness where assessable
  • whether deposits lift on light contact
Example observation wording

Soot deposit was recorded above the fireplace opening, with a dark fan-shaped accumulation across approximately 1.5 m of the chimney breast.

Biological growth

Description

Colonisation of a coated surface by algae, lichen, moss or higher plants.

Typical appearance

Green, black, orange or grey growth across the surface; sometimes patchy, sometimes general; concentrated on damp or sheltered orientations.

Possible contributing factors

Moisture retention, sheltered orientation, surface texture and proximity to vegetation can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • type of growth where identifiable
  • extent and pattern of colonisation
  • association with moisture sources or shelter
  • any apparent effect on the coating beneath
Example observation wording

Biological growth was recorded across the north-facing painted render, with a green algal film across the lower 1.5 m and isolated lichen colonies at higher level.

Mould spotting

Description

Discrete spots of mould growth on a coated surface, often associated with elevated humidity.

Typical appearance

Small dark spots, sometimes haloed, distributed across cold or sheltered surfaces; sometimes more visible under raking light.

Possible contributing factors

Elevated humidity, condensation history, poor ventilation and substrate dampness can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and distribution of spotting
  • association with cold or shaded surfaces
  • size of typical spots
  • any reported history of humidity or leaks
Example observation wording

Mould spotting was recorded across the upper wall, with discrete dark spots concentrated in the corner and faint halos around individual spots.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation advice where mould spotting affects historic decorative surfaces, and address moisture or ventilation sources before any cleaning is contemplated.

Adhesion and cohesion failure

Adhesion failure

Description

Loss of bond between a coating and the substrate to which it was applied.

Typical appearance

Lifted, detached or hollow-sounding coating across an area; clean substrate visible where coating has detached; minimal coating residue on the exposed substrate.

Possible contributing factors

Poor surface preparation, applications over damp or contaminated surfaces and incompatibility between coating and substrate can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent of detachment
  • whether the coating has actually lifted or sounds hollow
  • character of the exposed substrate
  • any visible coating residue on the substrate
Example observation wording

Adhesion failure was recorded across the lower panel, with a hollow-sounding area approximately 200 mm across and minimal coating residue visible at the edge of a recent loss.

Cohesion failure

Description

Loss of internal cohesion within a single coating layer, causing it to break apart within its own thickness.

Typical appearance

Coating layer that breaks within itself, leaving partial thickness on the substrate and partial thickness on the detached piece; sometimes with powdering through the layer.

Possible contributing factors

Binder degradation, weathering and original mix or application conditions can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent of cohesion loss across the element
  • whether breaks pass through the full layer
  • evidence of partial coating remaining on the substrate after loss
  • comparison with sound areas of the same layer
Example observation wording

Cohesion failure was recorded within the topmost paint layer, with detached fragments retaining only part of the original layer thickness and similar partial residue on the substrate.

Intercoat failure

Description

Loss of bond between adjacent layers within a multi-layer coating system.

Typical appearance

Detachment occurring cleanly between layers, leaving one or more intact layers on the substrate and others on the detached piece; layer boundaries often visible at the loss edge.

Possible contributing factors

Incompatibility between layers, application over insufficiently cured underlying coats, and applications over contaminated surfaces can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent of intercoat loss
  • which layers remain on the substrate and which detach
  • evidence of contamination or surface treatment between layers
  • number of layers identifiable at the loss edge
Example observation wording

Intercoat failure was recorded across the door panel, with the topmost two layers detaching cleanly from an underlying layer that remained intact on the substrate.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist paint conservation or analytical advice where intercoat failure affects a historic scheme, as the layer sequence may carry information of historic interest.

Previous overpainting and intervention

Overpainting

Description

Coating campaigns applied over earlier schemes, partially or fully concealing the original decoration.

Typical appearance

Visible later coatings over earlier work; layer edges or earlier scheme remnants visible at losses; sometimes with mismatched colour or texture relative to associated original elements.

Possible contributing factors

Past redecoration campaigns, change of use and routine maintenance can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • number of overpainted layers visible at losses
  • extent of original scheme remaining at edges and protected areas
  • any visible difference in colour, gloss or texture between layers
  • evidence of preparatory work between layers
Example observation wording

Overpainting was recorded across the wall, with at least three later layers visible at a recent paint loss and a fragment of an earlier polychrome scheme surviving behind the picture rail.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist paint conservation or paint analysis advice before any strip-back, as overpainted schemes may conceal layers of historic or artistic significance.

Incompatible coating

Description

Application of a coating that does not appear physically or chemically compatible with the underlying surface or scheme.

Typical appearance

Visible adhesion or cohesion problems concentrated where the later coating sits over a particular underlying material; sometimes with characteristic patterns of failure following the underlying scheme.

Possible contributing factors

Modern impermeable paints applied over traditional limewash, distemper or porous substrates can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • type of later coating where identifiable
  • type of underlying surface
  • pattern of failure relative to the underlying material
  • extent of associated coating breakdown
Example observation wording

Incompatible coating was recorded on the limewashed wall, with a later impermeable paint flaking concentrically and the underlying limewash visible at losses.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation advice where incompatible modern coatings have been applied over traditional finishes; removal options can affect both later coating and original scheme.

Failed previous coating

Description

Earlier coating campaign now showing widespread failure, distinct from older paint layers beneath.

Typical appearance

Most recent coating exhibiting flaking, peeling or detachment across significant areas; earlier layers beneath often appearing more stable.

Possible contributing factors

Coating choice, application conditions, surface preparation and underlying scheme can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent of failure of the most recent coating
  • relative condition of underlying layers
  • any documentary record of the last redecoration
  • implications for assessment of underlying historic scheme
Example observation wording

Failed previous coating was recorded across the door, with the most recent gloss layer detaching in sheets while earlier layers remained adhered to the substrate.

Inappropriate modern paint

Description

Modern paints used in locations where they appear unsuitable for the substrate or for the historic significance of the scheme.

Typical appearance

Bright, high-gloss or plastic-textured finishes inconsistent with surrounding original work; sometimes with associated failure or visible mismatch at junctions.

Possible contributing factors

Recent redecoration choices, off-the-shelf product selection and lack of specification can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of the modern paint
  • evidence of mismatch with adjacent original work
  • any associated coating failure
  • implications for any earlier scheme beneath
Example observation wording

Inappropriate modern paint was recorded on the dado, with a high-gloss white finish across an area approximately 4 m long contrasting with the matt limewashed wall above.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation advice before removing inappropriate modern paints from historic surfaces, as removal methods can affect both the modern paint and any earlier scheme beneath.

Brush mark disruption

Description

Brush marks or application texture from a later coating disrupting the visual continuity of an original scheme.

Typical appearance

Visible brush strokes, ridges or roller texture at variance with the smoother or directionally consistent original finish.

Possible contributing factors

Later redecoration campaigns and modern application methods over hand-applied original work can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent of areas showing later application texture
  • direction and character of marks
  • comparison with adjacent original work
  • any associated coating failure
Example observation wording

Brush mark disruption was recorded across the panel face, with bold horizontal strokes from a later coat overlaying the more uniform original finish.

Surface deposits and residues

Surface accretion

Description

Hardened or bonded surface deposit on a coated surface, distinct from loose soiling.

Typical appearance

Raised, crusted or hardened material adhering to the surface; sometimes following soiling patterns, sometimes localised.

Possible contributing factors

Atmospheric deposition, splashed materials, biological activity and earlier cleaning can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent, location and thickness of accretion
  • evidence of associated coating damage
  • any apparent source of the accreted material
  • whether the accretion conceals underlying detail
Example observation wording

Surface accretion was recorded across the lower face of the column, with a hardened deposit up to approximately 3 mm thick concealing the original moulding profile.

Wax residue

Description

Surface residue consistent with applied wax, polish or earlier coating maintenance.

Typical appearance

Glossy, semi-transparent surface film, sometimes patchy, sometimes pooled in detail; may dull and gather soiling over time.

Possible contributing factors

Past use of waxes, polishes or proprietary maintenance products can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and distribution of residue
  • evidence of pooling in carving or moulding detail
  • any visible soiling attached to or embedded in the residue
  • effect on legibility of underlying decoration
Example observation wording

Wax residue was recorded across the carved panel, with semi-transparent pooled material in the recesses and a faintly dulled finish across the prominent faces.

Adhesive residue

Description

Residue from tape, labels, fixings or earlier conservation treatments adhering to the surface.

Typical appearance

Patches of sticky, glossy, discoloured or hardened residue; sometimes with associated soiling embedded in the material; sometimes with sharp outline of original tape or label.

Possible contributing factors

Past use of tapes, labels, fixings or temporary conservation treatments can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and location of residue
  • evidence of original tape or label outlines
  • any associated discolouration of the surface beneath
  • implications for handling of any underlying decoration
Example observation wording

Adhesive residue was recorded on the door, with a rectangular patch approximately 80 by 50 mm of discoloured sticky material consistent with a previously applied label.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation advice where adhesive residues are present on a scheme of possible historic significance, as removal methods can affect underlying decoration.

Cleaning test mark

Description

Discrete patches of differing tone or surface character associated with earlier cleaning trials.

Typical appearance

Geometric or irregular patches of paler or differently surfaced material against the surrounding finish; sometimes annotated, sometimes unrecorded.

Possible contributing factors

Earlier cleaning trials by conservators, contractors or maintenance staff can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • location, size and shape of test patches
  • evidence of associated documentation
  • any visible variation in technique between patches
  • comparison with adjacent untreated surfaces
Example observation wording

Cleaning test marks were recorded on the left margin of the panel, with three rectangular patches of differing tone arranged in a column and no associated documentation visible on site.

Overcleaning indicator

Description

Surface features that may indicate earlier cleaning has gone beyond removal of surface soiling and affected the original finish.

Typical appearance

Loss of original surface texture, exposed substrate, thinning of paint layers, exaggeration of tool marks, or visible step at the edge of cleaned areas.

Possible contributing factors

Aggressive cleaning techniques, abrasive methods and overuse of solvents can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent of affected area
  • evidence of original surface character at adjacent uncleaned areas
  • any step or edge between cleaned and uncleaned zones
  • exposure of substrate where coating was previously continuous
Example observation wording

An overcleaning indicator was recorded across the lower panel, with a clear edge separating a noticeably paler cleaned area from the surrounding original finish.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation advice where overcleaning is suspected on a historic scheme, both to document residual evidence and to guide any further work.

Environmental and handling damage

Impact scratch

Description

Linear damage to a coated surface from impact with a sharp or hard object.

Typical appearance

Linear cut or gouge through one or more coating layers, sometimes exposing substrate; sometimes with associated paint lift along edges.

Possible contributing factors

Accidental contact, maintenance activity and use can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • length, depth and location of the scratch
  • number of coating layers affected
  • whether substrate is exposed
  • any associated paint lift along the scratch edges
Example observation wording

An impact scratch was recorded across the upper rail, with a linear cut approximately 120 mm long passing through the topmost two coating layers.

Scuffing

Description

Surface scuffs and rub marks from contact with objects, equipment or use.

Typical appearance

Greyish or dark rub marks on the coating surface, sometimes with associated coating loss; concentrated at contact heights and corners.

Possible contributing factors

Furniture contact, equipment movement, foot traffic and handling can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of scuffing
  • concentration at contact heights or corners
  • any associated coating loss
  • evidence of repeated contact
Example observation wording

Scuffing was recorded along the lower wall, with grey marks approximately 200 mm above floor level consistent with furniture contact.

Fading

Description

Loss of colour intensity in a coating exposed to light.

Typical appearance

Paler colour relative to areas of the same scheme protected from light; sometimes with sharp boundaries where furniture, fittings or framing have shielded the surface.

Possible contributing factors

Light exposure, especially direct sunlight, and pigment characteristics can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent of fading across the element
  • presence of shielded reference areas
  • estimated magnitude of colour change where comparison is possible
  • association with windows or light sources
Example observation wording

Fading was recorded across the south-facing panel, with the field colour visibly paler than the original shade revealed behind a recently removed fitting.

Colour shift

Description

Change in hue of a coating beyond simple lightening, including yellowing, greening, browning or pinking.

Typical appearance

Visible shift in hue relative to protected reference areas or to documentary record; sometimes uniform, sometimes localised.

Possible contributing factors

Pigment changes, binder yellowing, environmental exposure and chemical interaction with overlying or underlying layers can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • direction and intensity of the colour shift
  • uniformity across the element
  • comparison with sheltered or protected areas
  • any associated coating change
Example observation wording

Colour shift was recorded across the painted panel, with a yellow-brown cast over the original cool grey visible by comparison with the area beneath the removed fitting.

Differential fading

Description

Uneven fading across a coated surface, often following light or shading patterns.

Typical appearance

Variable colour intensity across the surface, sometimes following the outline of shadows, fittings or windows; sometimes patchy without clear pattern.

Possible contributing factors

Variable light exposure, partial shading by fittings, blinds or earlier furniture arrangements can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • pattern and distribution of fading
  • association with light sources, shading or removed fittings
  • any visible outline of past furniture or framing
  • comparison with consistently shielded areas
Example observation wording

Differential fading was recorded across the wall, with a rectangular zone of more saturated colour matching the outline of a previously hung picture.

Heat damage indicator

Description

Surface features that may indicate exposure of a coating to elevated temperature.

Typical appearance

Bubbled, scorched, discoloured or charred areas; sometimes with associated loss; concentrated near heat sources such as lamps, radiators, flues or fittings.

Possible contributing factors

Proximity to heat sources, past lighting or heating arrangements and accidental exposure can be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent and location of affected area
  • proximity to known or removed heat sources
  • character of associated coating change
  • any evidence of scorching of the substrate
Example observation wording

A heat damage indicator was recorded above the wall-mounted lamp, with a discoloured fan-shaped patch and isolated blistering of the paint film.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where heat damage may affect a historic decorative scheme, particularly before any redecoration that might conceal the underlying condition.

Recording reminders

Describe what is visible. Record the observed condition, its location, extent and any associated evidence before attempting interpretation.

Avoid:

  • stating the age, composition or significance of a scheme as confirmed without analysis or documentary support;
  • diagnosing the cause of coating failure from surface appearance alone;
  • describing treatment in a survey observation rather than in a separate recommendation.

Prefer cautious language such as:

  • “observed”, “recorded”, “visible”;
  • “may indicate”, “can be associated with”, “consistent with”;
  • “record whether…”, “consider specialist review where…”.
Specialist review

When to consider specialist review

Many conditions in this volume — including powdering or friability of historic limewash and distempers, varnish cracking or loss over significant painted schemes, loss of gilding, stencil detail or painted inscriptions, intercoat failure within multi-layer schemes, overpainting concealing earlier work, incompatible modern coatings on traditional substrates, ingrained soiling on significant schemes, and suspected overcleaning — warrant qualified paint, polychromy, gilding or decorative conservation advice before any cleaning, consolidation, retouching, overpainting or stripping is contemplated. The Responsible Commissioning Guide offers further prompts for determining when specialist review, analysis or documentary investigation may be appropriate.

Other Defect Atlas volumes

The Defect Atlas currently includes volumes for architectural metalwork, stone, timber, stained glass, paintings, textiles, ceramics & terracotta, plaster, render & stucco, mortars, pointing & joints, roofing & rainwater goods, brickwork & masonry units, sculpture & monuments, historic concrete, and decorative finishes & coatings. Further volumes may follow.

Related tools

Related Atlas volumes

Other Defect Atlas volumes — open a sibling area within Timber & finishes or browse across the wider atlas programme.

This atlas supports recognition and description only. It does not confirm causes, prescribe treatment, replace material analysis or paint sampling, and does not replace specialist paint, polychromy, gilding or decorative conservation advice. The composition, layer sequence, age, significance and condition of historic coatings cannot be confirmed from visual observation alone and require appropriate investigation. Where evidence is uncertain, where loss appears active, or where the scheme may carry historic or artistic significance, refer observations to qualified specialists before any cleaning, consolidation, retouching, overpainting or stripping is contemplated.