Resources
Knowledge Tools

Defect Atlas — Stone

A practical guide to recognising and describing common stone conditions and defects during conservation surveys.

Using this volume

This volume of the Defect Atlas is a recognition and description aid for surveyors recording stone fabric. It supports consistent terminology and cautious observation, not diagnosis, treatment or specification.

The atlas helps users:

  • recognise common conditions encountered on stone surfaces and assemblies;
  • describe what is visible in clear, neutral language;
  • avoid unsupported diagnosis of cause, performance or urgency;
  • identify situations where specialist conservation review may be appropriate.

The atlas does not:

  • confirm causes of deterioration;
  • prescribe treatment, cleaning or consolidation;
  • replace material testing, salt analysis or structural investigation;
  • replace specialist conservation or engineering advice.
Where this sits

A practical survey resource, not a terminology reference

The Defect Atlas is part of Survey Resources — practical guides that support recording in the field. It is not part of the Reference Library, which holds curated terminology and material definitions, and it is separate from project-specific references held within individual projects.

Defect categories

Entries are grouped informally under the broad themes below. Many conditions span more than one theme; record what is observed rather than forcing a single category.

Individual defect entries

37 entries. Use cautious language throughout: describe what is visible, and reserve interpretation for sections explicitly identified as such.

Surface loss and erosion

Surface erosion

Description

Progressive loss of surface material reducing the original profile of the stone.

Typical appearance

Softened arrises, rounded mouldings, loss of crisp tooling, generally weathered face.

Possible contributing factors

Long-term weathering, exposure, rainwater wash and atmospheric action may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and location
  • loss of carved or moulded detail
  • comparison with sheltered areas of the same stone
  • whether loss appears active or historic
Example observation wording

Surface erosion was recorded across the south-facing string course, with loss of moulded profile observed when compared with sheltered returns.

Granular disintegration

Description

Loss of cohesion between mineral grains causing the surface to release sand-sized particles.

Typical appearance

Friable, sugary surface; loose grains accumulating at the base of the element; loss of tool marks.

Possible contributing factors

Salt crystallisation, freeze-thaw cycling, loss of binder and atmospheric acids may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent across the element
  • presence of detached grains at the base
  • associated salt deposits
  • relationship to moisture zones
Example observation wording

Granular disintegration was observed on the lower courses, with loose grains visible on the plinth below.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where loss is active, widespread or associated with suspected salt or moisture activity.

Sugaring

Description

A specific form of granular disintegration producing a fine, sugar-like surface, most often recorded on marbles and fine-grained calcareous stones.

Typical appearance

Crystalline, sparkling surface; loss of polish or carved finish; fine grains released to the touch.

Possible contributing factors

Thermal cycling, acid deposition and intergranular weakening may be associated with this condition.

Recording prompts
  • stone type where known
  • extent and location
  • loss of original finish or polish
  • any associated cracking
Example observation wording

Sugaring was recorded across the exposed face of the marble panel, with loss of original polish noted.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where sugaring affects sculptural or polished surfaces of significance.

Scaling

Description

Detachment of a thin surface layer that follows the worked face rather than the bedding.

Typical appearance

Curling or lifting flakes following the face of the stone; sound-hollow response on light tapping.

Possible contributing factors

Salt subflorescence, gypsum crust formation and thermal cycling may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent of affected area
  • thickness of scale where measurable
  • areas sounding hollow on light tapping
  • loss of carved detail beneath
Example observation wording

Scaling was recorded on the upper face of the cornice, with several scales sounding hollow on light tapping.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where scaling is active, where carved detail is at risk, or before any consolidation trial is contemplated.

Flaking

Description

Detachment of small, thin platelets from the stone surface.

Typical appearance

Small plate-like fragments lifting from the surface; loose flakes accumulating below.

Possible contributing factors

Salt action, freeze-thaw cycling or surface treatments may be associated with flaking.

Recording prompts
  • approximate size of flakes
  • extent across the element
  • evidence of active loss
  • condition of stone beneath flakes
Example observation wording

Flaking was recorded on the sheltered face of the buttress, with loose platelets observed on the offset below.

Delamination

Description

Separation of stone into successive layers, often parallel to bedding planes.

Typical appearance

Layered separation visible at arrises; sheet-like loss aligned with bedding; sound-hollow zones.

Possible contributing factors

Face-bedding, freeze-thaw cycling and salt action within bedding planes may be associated with delamination.

Recording prompts
  • bedding orientation where visible
  • thickness and extent of detached layers
  • evidence of active loss
  • structural significance of affected element
Example observation wording

Delamination was observed on the parapet coping, with separation visible along the bedding plane on the weather face.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where delamination affects load-bearing or weathering elements.

Blistering

Description

Localised raised domes on the stone surface caused by detachment of a surface layer.

Typical appearance

Hollow, dome-shaped lifting of the surface; sound-hollow response; sometimes broken to expose substrate.

Possible contributing factors

Salt subflorescence, trapped moisture beneath surface treatments or applied coatings may be associated.

Recording prompts
  • size and distribution of blisters
  • whether blisters are intact or broken
  • evidence of salt or moisture activity
  • presence of previous surface treatment
Example observation wording

Blistering was recorded across the rendered patch, with two blisters broken to expose granular material beneath.

Alveolar erosion

Description

A network of interconnected cavities resembling honeycomb produced by differential weathering.

Typical appearance

Honeycomb pattern of small cavities; loss preferentially following weaker laminae or zones.

Possible contributing factors

Salt crystallisation, wind action and selective dissolution may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and depth of cavities
  • orientation relative to exposure
  • associated salt deposits
  • any active loss of fragments
Example observation wording

Alveolar erosion was observed on the seaward face, with cavities up to 20 mm deep recorded across the lower course.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where alveolar erosion is extensive or where structural section is reduced.

Pitting

Description

Small, discrete cavities in the stone surface.

Typical appearance

Pinpoint to small-diameter pits, isolated or clustered, sometimes following original surface defects.

Possible contributing factors

Localised dissolution, salt activity or original mineralogical weakness may be associated.

Recording prompts
  • distribution and density of pits
  • approximate depth where measurable
  • relationship to bedding or jointing
  • evidence of ongoing activity
Example observation wording

Pitting was recorded on the limestone ashlar, with clustered pits across the lower 300 mm of the face.

Rounding of carved detail

Description

Progressive loss of definition in carved, moulded or tooled surfaces.

Typical appearance

Softened arrises, blurred carving, reduced depth of mouldings, indistinct tool marks.

Possible contributing factors

Long-term weathering, atmospheric action and prior cleaning may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • comparison with sheltered or replacement sections
  • extent and location of loss
  • any evidence of prior aggressive cleaning
  • significance of the affected detail
Example observation wording

Rounding of carved detail was recorded on the exposed capital, with shallow definition of the foliate carving when compared with the sheltered return.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where rounding affects significant carved or sculptural detail and recording or replication may be required.

Loss of tooling marks

Description

Erosion or removal of original surface tooling that contributed to the appearance of the stone.

Typical appearance

Loss of chisel, pick, droved or boasted finishes; smoothed or weathered face.

Possible contributing factors

Weathering, abrasive cleaning or surface erosion may be associated.

Recording prompts
  • type of tooling where identifiable
  • extent of loss
  • comparison with adjacent areas
  • evidence of past cleaning interventions
Example observation wording

Loss of tooling marks was recorded across the exposed face of the quoin, with the original droved finish only visible on the sheltered return.

Friable surface

Description

Surface that releases material to light touch without yet showing developed disintegration.

Typical appearance

Powdery or soft surface; material lifts under finger pressure; loose grains in shadow areas.

Possible contributing factors

Early-stage salt or moisture action and binder loss may be associated.

Recording prompts
  • extent of friability
  • associated salt or moisture indicators
  • location relative to weathering pathways
  • whether all faces are affected or only specific exposures
Example observation wording

A friable surface was recorded on the lower course, with grains released to light brushing for diagnostic purposes only.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review before any handling, cleaning or sampling of friable surfaces of significance.

Cracking and fracture

Hairline cracking

Description

Fine surface cracks visible on close inspection.

Typical appearance

Thread-like cracks, often following surface features; minimal width; sometimes only visible when damp.

Possible contributing factors

Drying, thermal cycling, early-stage stress or surface treatments may be associated with hairline cracking.

Recording prompts
  • orientation and length
  • whether the crack passes through bedding
  • any associated movement
  • comparison with previous records if available
Example observation wording

Hairline cracking was observed on the upper face of the cill, running approximately 80 mm parallel to the front edge.

Open cracking

Description

Cracks with visible width sufficient to admit moisture or debris.

Typical appearance

Clearly open cracks; sometimes with debris, vegetation or staining within.

Possible contributing factors

Movement, sustained stress, freeze-thaw cycling or corrosion of embedded fixings may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • orientation, length and approximate width
  • evidence of active movement
  • presence of debris or staining within the crack
  • implications for water shedding
Example observation wording

An open crack was recorded across the keystone, approximately 1 mm wide and 220 mm long, with associated staining on the soffit below.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist or structural review where open cracking suggests active movement, affects a load-bearing element or admits water to embedded fixings.

Fracture

Description

A through-section break in the stone.

Typical appearance

Fully separated stone; visible offset; in some cases held in place only by surrounding fabric.

Possible contributing factors

Impact, overload, long-term stress or corrosion-induced expansion of embedded metal may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and orientation
  • any displacement across the fracture
  • relationship to fixings or embedded metalwork
  • implications for stability of the element
Example observation wording

A fracture was recorded across the lower section of the pinnacle, with no measurable displacement at the time of survey.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist or structural review where a fracture affects stability, falling potential or any load-bearing function.

Spalling

Description

Detachment of a fragment of stone, often associated with expansion of embedded materials or freeze-thaw action.

Typical appearance

Missing fragments leaving fresh fracture surfaces; sometimes associated with visible embedded metalwork or salts.

Possible contributing factors

Corrosion of embedded metal, freeze-thaw cycling and salt action may contribute to spalling.

Recording prompts
  • size and location of spalled area
  • evidence of embedded metalwork or salts
  • whether the spall is recent or weathered
  • associated cracking nearby
Example observation wording

Spalling was recorded adjacent to the iron cramp, exposing a corroded fixing within the fracture surface.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where spalling is associated with embedded ferrous metalwork or affects elements at height.

Bedding-plane weakness

Description

Loss or fracture preferentially aligned with sedimentary bedding within the stone.

Typical appearance

Layered loss or cracking along bedding; sometimes a stepped profile on weathered faces.

Possible contributing factors

Face-bedding, freeze-thaw cycling and salt action within bedding may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • bedding orientation where visible
  • extent of loss along the bedding plane
  • comparison with correctly bedded stones nearby
  • implications for ongoing loss
Example observation wording

Bedding-plane weakness was observed on the face-bedded sill, with a layered loss approximately 5 mm deep.

Moisture and salts

Salt efflorescence

Description

Visible white deposit of soluble salts on the stone surface.

Typical appearance

White, crystalline or powdery deposits; sometimes seasonal; may bloom after wet weather.

Possible contributing factors

Salt-bearing water reaching the surface and evaporating may produce efflorescence. Sources can include rising damp, run-off, de-icing salts or marine spray.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent
  • relationship to moisture pathways
  • seasonality where known
  • association with surface loss
Example observation wording

Salt efflorescence was recorded on the lower courses, more prominent following recent rainfall.

Subflorescence

Description

Crystallisation of salts within the pore network just beneath the stone surface.

Typical appearance

Typically not visible directly; inferred from associated blistering, scaling or granular loss without surface salt deposit.

Possible contributing factors

Cycles of dissolution and crystallisation of salts within stone pores may be associated.

Recording prompts
  • associated surface conditions
  • moisture sources nearby
  • any history of salt exposure
  • extent of associated loss
Example observation wording

Subflorescence is suspected behind the active scaling on the lower course, though confirmation would require sampling.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where subflorescence is suspected and salt sampling or analysis may be appropriate.

Damp staining

Description

Discolouration consistent with persistent or repeated wetting.

Typical appearance

Darker zones on the stone surface, often following drainage or capillary pathways.

Possible contributing factors

Rising damp, run-off, leaking services or blocked drainage may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and orientation
  • relationship to drainage or services
  • evidence of associated salts or biological growth
  • any seasonal variation where known
Example observation wording

Damp staining was recorded on the lower 600 mm of the plinth, consistent with a persistent moisture source.

Water run-off staining

Description

Linear or fan-shaped discolouration following the path of rainwater across the stone surface.

Typical appearance

Streaks, drips or fans of discolouration extending downward from features such as cills or projections.

Possible contributing factors

Rainwater wash from upper features, blocked or absent drips and accumulated soiling above may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • source feature where identifiable
  • extent and orientation
  • associated soiling or biological growth
  • drip detail condition above
Example observation wording

Water run-off staining was recorded below the cill, with a fan-shaped stain extending approximately 400 mm downward.

Biological growth and soiling

Biological growth

Description

Living organisms colonising the stone surface.

Typical appearance

Algae, lichen, moss or higher plants on or within the stone.

Possible contributing factors

Moisture retention, sheltered orientation, lack of maintenance and nutrient availability may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • type of growth where identifiable
  • extent and location
  • association with water retention
  • any apparent physical effect on the substrate
Example observation wording

Biological growth was recorded across the north-facing buttress, with moss colonising the recessed bed joints.

Lichen colonisation

Description

Establishment of lichen species on the stone surface.

Typical appearance

Crust-like, foliose or fruticose growth; often patchy and variable in colour.

Possible contributing factors

Exposure, low pollution levels and suitable substrate chemistry may support lichen colonisation.

Recording prompts
  • extent and distribution
  • any visible physical effect on the surface
  • ecological or heritage significance where known
  • differentiation from staining or crust
Example observation wording

Lichen colonisation was recorded across the upper surface of the chest tomb, with several species present.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review before any cleaning where lichens may have ecological, age or heritage significance.

Algae and green staining

Description

Green discolouration associated with algal growth on persistently damp surfaces.

Typical appearance

Soft green, dark green or black-green films, often following moisture pathways.

Possible contributing factors

Persistent moisture, sheltered orientation and water run-off may support algal growth.

Recording prompts
  • extent and location
  • association with run-off or drainage
  • any active source of moisture
  • any associated softening of the substrate
Example observation wording

Algal staining was recorded below the cill, consistent with the run-off pattern observed above.

Black crust

Description

Hardened black deposit found on sheltered surfaces of limestones and lime-rich stones.

Typical appearance

Dark, hard, often blistered crust; sharp boundary at run-off lines; may obscure underlying carving.

Possible contributing factors

Reaction of atmospheric sulphur compounds with calcareous stone and deposition of particulates may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and thickness
  • relationship to sheltered and washed areas
  • any associated scaling beneath the crust
  • obscuring of carved detail
Example observation wording

Black crust was recorded across the sheltered face of the cornice, with sharp boundary at the rain-washed line.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review before any cleaning of black crust, particularly on carved or fragile surfaces.

Atmospheric soiling

Description

Surface accumulation of particulate matter from the atmosphere.

Typical appearance

General grey or dark soiling layer; uneven distribution between sheltered and washed areas.

Possible contributing factors

Urban pollution, traffic, proximity to combustion sources and time since cleaning may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and uniformity
  • any obscuring of condition assessment
  • relationship to sheltered surfaces
  • comparison with adjacent buildings
Example observation wording

Atmospheric soiling was recorded across the elevation, with heavier deposits in sheltered zones.

Gypsum crust

Description

Crust composed largely of gypsum produced by reaction between calcareous stone and atmospheric sulphur compounds.

Typical appearance

Hardened, often blistered crust; can incorporate dark soiling; may show fine cracking.

Possible contributing factors

Atmospheric SO₂ exposure, particulate deposition and sheltered exposure may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and condition of crust
  • any scaling or loss beneath
  • relationship to weathering pattern
  • evidence of active detachment
Example observation wording

A gypsum crust was recorded on the sheltered soffit, with localised lifting noted at the lower edge.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where removal or stabilisation is being considered; aggressive cleaning of gypsum crusts can damage underlying carved detail.

Structural movement and displacement

Detachment

Description

A section of stone or carved element showing signs of separation from its support.

Typical appearance

Visible gap, hollow sound on light tapping, or visible movement at the interface.

Possible contributing factors

Corroding fixings, mortar loss, frost action behind the element or original construction may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent
  • evidence of associated fixings
  • implications for falling fragments
  • evidence of recent movement
Example observation wording

Detachment was suspected on the upper section of the panel, with a hollow response on light tapping.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist or structural review where detachment is suspected, particularly at height or on public-facing elevations.

Displacement

Description

A stone or assembly that has moved measurably from its original position.

Typical appearance

Offset between adjacent stones, visible projection or recess, opening of joints.

Possible contributing factors

Settlement, overload, lateral pressure, freeze-thaw action or fixing failure may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • direction and magnitude of displacement
  • associated joint opening
  • comparison with reference points
  • evidence of recent movement
Example observation wording

Displacement was recorded at the upper voussoir, with an offset of approximately 8 mm relative to the adjacent stone.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist or structural review where displacement affects arches, parapets, copings or other elements where stability is significant.

Open joints

Description

Joints between stones that have opened beyond the original construction profile.

Typical appearance

Visible gaps between stones; ingress of debris or vegetation; daylight visible through assemblies.

Possible contributing factors

Mortar loss, movement, thermal cycling and corrosion-induced expansion may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and width
  • associated displacement
  • presence of debris or vegetation
  • implications for water shedding
Example observation wording

Open joints were recorded along the upper course of the parapet, with widths up to 6 mm visible at the front face.

Repair and intervention issues

Failed pointing

Description

Loss or breakdown of mortar within joints between stones.

Typical appearance

Recessed, missing, cracked or detached mortar; voids in joints; sometimes accompanied by vegetation.

Possible contributing factors

Age, weathering, original specification, vegetation growth or movement may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and depth of loss
  • any evidence of recent loss
  • presence of vegetation within joints
  • associated stone condition
Example observation wording

Failed pointing was recorded across the upper courses, with joints recessed by up to 20 mm.

Cementitious repair incompatibility

Description

Use of hard, cement-rich mortars or repairs adjacent to softer historic stone.

Typical appearance

Hard mortar lines standing proud of weathered stone; localised stone loss adjacent to the repair.

Possible contributing factors

Use of Portland cement-based materials with low vapour permeability adjacent to historic stone may contribute to localised damage.

Recording prompts
  • extent and location of cementitious material
  • condition of adjacent stone
  • any associated salt or moisture activity
  • differentiation from lime-based repairs
Example observation wording

Cementitious repair incompatibility was suspected at the lower course, with localised granular loss observed in the stone adjacent to a cement-rich mortar.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review before removal of cementitious repairs; inappropriate removal can cause further loss.

Inappropriate mortar

Description

Mortar that appears unsuitable for the stone type, exposure or original construction.

Typical appearance

Visually mismatched mortar; standing proud, recessed or differently weathered to original.

Possible contributing factors

Choice of binder, aggregate, mix proportions or application may not match the original specification.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of inappropriate mortar
  • comparison with surviving historic mortar
  • associated stone condition
  • any evidence of moisture or salt activity
Example observation wording

Inappropriate mortar was recorded on the repointed section, standing proud of the adjacent weathered stone.

Previous repair failure

Description

An earlier repair that is no longer performing its intended function.

Typical appearance

Cracked, detached, eroded or differentially weathered repairs; sometimes accompanied by renewed loss in the original stone.

Possible contributing factors

Original specification, age, compatibility and exposure may contribute to failure of earlier repairs.

Recording prompts
  • type of repair where identifiable
  • extent and nature of failure
  • condition of surrounding original fabric
  • any documentary record of earlier work
Example observation wording

A previous repair failure was recorded on the cill, with a stone repair cracked and partially detached from the original substrate.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review before removing or making good failed historic repairs, particularly on significant elements.

Surface deposits and staining

Iron staining

Description

Brown, orange or red discolouration associated with iron-bearing materials.

Typical appearance

Brown to red-brown streaks or patches, often radiating from fixings, cramps or natural inclusions.

Possible contributing factors

Corrosion of embedded ferrous fixings, run-off from adjacent metalwork or iron-bearing inclusions within the stone may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • source of staining where identifiable
  • extent and orientation
  • evidence of associated spalling or cracking
  • presence of embedded metalwork
Example observation wording

Iron staining was recorded radiating from the upper cramp position, consistent with corrosion of the embedded fixing.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where iron staining indicates corrosion of embedded structural fixings.

Copper staining

Description

Green or blue-green discolouration associated with copper or copper-alloy elements.

Typical appearance

Green to blue-green streaks running below copper-bearing flashings, gutters or fixings.

Possible contributing factors

Run-off from copper or copper-alloy elements may deposit corrosion products on the stone below.

Recording prompts
  • source element where identifiable
  • extent and orientation
  • any associated softening or loss of the stone
  • condition of the metal element above
Example observation wording

Copper staining was recorded below the copper flashing, with a green streak extending approximately 600 mm down the face.

Surface deposits

Description

Non-biological accumulations on the stone surface from external sources.

Typical appearance

Soot, dust, salt films, paint splashes, droppings or other adhered materials.

Possible contributing factors

Atmospheric pollution, run-off, adjacent activity or lack of cleaning may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • type of deposit where identifiable
  • extent and thickness
  • whether deposits obscure condition assessment
  • any associated staining or biological growth
Example observation wording

Surface deposits were recorded on the lower courses, with a dark soiling layer obscuring assessment of underlying condition in places.

Recording reminders

Describe what is visible. Record the observed condition, its location, extent and any associated evidence before attempting interpretation.

Avoid:

  • assuming cause without supporting evidence;
  • assuming urgency without evidence of active loss or risk;
  • describing treatment in a survey observation rather than in a separate recommendation.

Prefer cautious language such as:

  • “observed”, “recorded”, “visible”;
  • “may indicate”, “can be associated with”, “consistent with”;
  • “record whether…”, “consider specialist review where…”.
Specialist review

When to consider specialist conservation review

Several conditions in this volume — including active scaling, suspected salt activity, detachment at height, fractures affecting stability, and removal of historic crusts or repairs — warrant qualified conservation or structural advice before any intervention is contemplated. The Responsible Commissioning Guide offers further prompts for determining when specialist review, testing, investigation or monitoring may be appropriate.

Related tools

This atlas supports recognition and description only. It does not confirm causes, prescribe treatment, replace testing or replace specialist conservation advice. Where evidence is uncertain or risk is unclear, refer to qualified conservators or engineers.