Resources
Knowledge Tools

Defect Atlas — Stained Glass

A practical guide to recognising and describing common stained glass conditions and defects during conservation surveys.

Using this volume

This volume of the Defect Atlas is a recognition and description aid for surveyors recording stained glass. It supports consistent terminology and cautious observation, not diagnosis, treatment or specification.

The atlas helps users:

  • recognise common conditions encountered on stained glass, leadwork and glazing systems;
  • describe what is visible in clear, neutral language;
  • avoid unsupported diagnosis of cause, period or urgency;
  • identify situations where specialist stained glass conservation review may be appropriate.

The atlas does not:

  • confirm causes of deterioration or attribute periods of manufacture;
  • prescribe treatment, cleaning or releading;
  • replace material analysis, environmental monitoring or structural investigation;
  • replace specialist stained glass conservation or engineering advice.
Where this sits

A practical survey resource, not a terminology reference

The Defect Atlas is part of Survey Resources — practical guides that support recording in the field. It is not part of the Reference Library, which holds curated terminology and material definitions, and it is separate from project-specific references held within individual projects.

Defect categories

Entries are grouped informally under the broad themes below. Many conditions span more than one theme; record what is observed rather than forcing a single category.

Individual defect entries

46 entries. Use cautious language throughout: describe what is visible, and reserve interpretation for sections explicitly identified as such.

Glass deterioration

Surface corrosion of glass

Description

Chemical alteration of the glass surface producing visible degradation of the original finish.

Typical appearance

Dulled, frosted or iridescent surface; sometimes with localised pitting; loss of original gloss.

Possible contributing factors

Original glass composition, atmospheric moisture, condensation and pollutants may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and location
  • comparison between interior and exterior faces
  • any loss of paint or decoration over affected areas
  • association with condensation pathways
Example observation wording

Surface corrosion was recorded on the external face of the medieval glass, with a generally dulled appearance and localised iridescence.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist stained glass conservation review where corrosion affects historically significant glass or appears active.

Crizzling

Description

A fine network of cracks within the glass surface associated with instability of the original composition.

Typical appearance

Fine, often interconnected surface cracks; dull, sometimes sweating surface; in advanced stages, flaking of the surface layer.

Possible contributing factors

Unstable original glass composition combined with humid environments may contribute to crizzling.

Recording prompts
  • extent of affected glass
  • presence of associated surface flaking
  • any visible moisture on the surface
  • environmental conditions around the panel
Example observation wording

Crizzling was observed across several pieces of pale glass in the lower panel, with a fine network of surface cracks visible in raking light.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where crizzling is recorded; affected glass is typically highly sensitive to handling and environment.

Surface pitting

Description

Small discrete cavities in the glass surface produced by localised corrosion.

Typical appearance

Pinpoint to small-diameter pits, isolated or clustered; sometimes filled with corrosion product or weathering crust.

Possible contributing factors

Glass composition, prolonged surface wetting and pollutant deposition may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • distribution and density of pits
  • association with run-off patterns
  • any loss of paint over pitted areas
  • comparison between exposed and sheltered glass
Example observation wording

Surface pitting was recorded on the external face of several pieces in the exposed lower lights, with clustered pits in run-off zones.

Weathering crust

Description

An adherent layer of degradation product on the surface of the glass.

Typical appearance

Whitish, greyish or yellow-brown crust on the surface, sometimes obscuring painted detail.

Possible contributing factors

Long-term reaction between glass surface and atmospheric moisture and pollutants may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and thickness of crust
  • whether crust obscures original decoration
  • association with external pollution sources
  • comparison with sheltered glass
Example observation wording

A weathering crust was recorded across the exterior of the medieval panels, partly obscuring painted detail when viewed from outside.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation review before any cleaning of weathering crusts on historic glass.

Iridescence

Description

A rainbow-like surface appearance produced by interference within weathered glass layers.

Typical appearance

Patchy or pervasive iridescent sheen, often with peeling or flaking of the affected layer.

Possible contributing factors

Long-term surface weathering producing thin layered alteration of the original glass surface may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and location
  • any associated flaking of the surface
  • stability of paint over affected glass
  • comparison between faces
Example observation wording

Iridescence was recorded on the exterior of several pieces, with associated flaking of the surface layer in places.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where iridescent layers are flaking from historic glass.

Hairline cracking

Description

Fine cracks through the glass thickness without offset.

Typical appearance

Thread-like cracks within individual quarries; sometimes only visible in raking or transmitted light.

Possible contributing factors

Thermal stress, original glass condition, fixing stress or impact may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and orientation
  • number of pieces affected
  • whether cracks are confined to one quarry
  • any associated movement of the panel
Example observation wording

Hairline cracking was recorded in three quarries of the upper light, visible most clearly in raking light from inside.

Through-cracking with offset

Description

Cracks where the two sides have moved out of plane relative to one another.

Typical appearance

Clearly stepped cracks; sometimes admitting light through the offset; possible loose fragments.

Possible contributing factors

Significant impact, panel movement, frame distortion or sustained loading may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and orientation
  • size of offset
  • stability of fragments
  • implications for water ingress
Example observation wording

A through-crack with approximately 1 mm offset was recorded in the lower border, with the affected piece appearing stable at the time of survey.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where cracks with offset are recorded; fragments may require stabilisation.

Loose glass fragments

Description

Cracked pieces of glass whose stability within the leaded matrix appears compromised.

Typical appearance

Visibly displaced or movable fragments; sometimes only retained by paint, cement or proximity.

Possible contributing factors

Cracking, loss of cement, lead deterioration or vibration may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and number of fragments
  • extent of movement under light handling
  • evidence of past stabilising repair
  • implications for water ingress and falling material
Example observation wording

A loose fragment was recorded in the upper border, retained only by adjacent leadwork at the time of survey.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation review without delay where loose fragments are recorded, particularly at height or above public space.

Lost glass pieces

Description

Pieces of glass absent from the leaded matrix.

Typical appearance

Empty calmes, voids in the design; sometimes temporarily infilled with non-original glazing.

Possible contributing factors

Past damage, theft, vandalism or earlier removal without replacement may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent
  • any documentation of original appearance
  • current weathering of empty calmes
  • presence of temporary infill
Example observation wording

A lost piece was recorded at the head of the right-hand light, with the calmes weathered and no temporary infill present.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where lost pieces affect significant historic glazing.

Glass discolouration

Description

Alteration of the original glass colour by long-term exposure or composition effects.

Typical appearance

Yellowed, purpled or otherwise altered colour, sometimes affecting only certain pieces or batches.

Possible contributing factors

UV exposure, glass composition and long-term weathering may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • pieces or batches affected
  • comparison with sheltered or replacement glass
  • whether discolouration is consistent across the design
  • association with corrosion or weathering
Example observation wording

Mild purpling was recorded in a batch of pale glass within the central light, consistent with manganese-bearing glass exposed to long-term UV.

Paint and fired decoration

Paint loss

Description

Loss of vitreous painted detail from the surface of the glass.

Typical appearance

Gaps in painted lines or shading; reduced legibility of features; sometimes outlines retained only as ghost images.

Possible contributing factors

Original firing temperature, surface deterioration of the glass and abrasive cleaning may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent of loss
  • which pieces or figures are affected
  • association with surface corrosion or crizzling
  • any evidence of past cleaning
Example observation wording

Paint loss was recorded across the figure of the central saint, with significant loss of facial detail.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation review where paint loss affects significant historic decoration.

Friable paint

Description

Painted detail that releases material to light touch without yet showing developed loss.

Typical appearance

Powdery or soft paint surface; material lifts to gentle brushing for diagnostic purposes; sometimes visible only in raking light.

Possible contributing factors

Underfired paint, surface weathering and condensation may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent of friable areas
  • association with environmental conditions
  • stability under handling
  • comparison between figures and backgrounds
Example observation wording

Friable paint was recorded on the interior face of the central figure, with material released to light brushing for diagnostic purposes only.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review before any handling, cleaning or relocation of friable painted glass.

Flaking paint

Description

Detachment of painted detail as small flakes from the glass surface.

Typical appearance

Lifted or curled paint fragments; loss of legibility; sometimes loose flakes captured between glass and protective glazing.

Possible contributing factors

Underfired paint, glass corrosion beneath the paint or moisture cycling may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and location of flaking
  • size of detached areas
  • condition of underlying glass
  • evidence of active loss
Example observation wording

Flaking paint was recorded on the inscription panel, with several flakes detached and resting in the lower calme.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where painted detail of significance is actively flaking.

Silver stain alteration

Description

Alteration of fired silver stain decoration in colour, intensity or stability.

Typical appearance

Faded, patchy or discoloured yellow staining; sometimes associated surface corrosion of the glass beneath.

Possible contributing factors

Long-term weathering, surface corrosion and original firing may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and location
  • comparison with sheltered or interior areas
  • association with general glass deterioration
  • any current loss
Example observation wording

Alteration of silver stain was recorded on the haloes in the upper figures, with reduced intensity in exposed areas.

Enamel deterioration

Description

Loss, crazing or alteration of fired enamel decoration on the glass surface.

Typical appearance

Crazed, lifting or partly lost enamel; sometimes with associated discolouration.

Possible contributing factors

Original firing, thermal expansion mismatch with the glass and moisture cycling may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • type of enamel where identifiable
  • extent and location
  • evidence of active loss
  • association with glass condition
Example observation wording

Enamel deterioration was recorded on the post-medieval panel, with crazing visible across the blue drapery.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation review where enamel decoration is friable or actively detaching.

Soiling over paint

Description

Surface soiling that obscures painted detail but may also conceal underlying paint instability.

Typical appearance

Dark surface deposits over painted areas; reduced legibility of decoration.

Possible contributing factors

Atmospheric soiling, condensation and proximity to internal heating may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent of soiling
  • association with internal or external sources
  • whether soiling is stable or actively accumulating
  • any evidence of paint instability beneath
Example observation wording

Soiling over paint was recorded on the interior face of the chancel windows, with painted detail less legible than on comparable panels nearby.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review before any cleaning of soiled painted surfaces, as paint instability may underlie surface deposits.

Lead cames and solder joints

Lead fatigue

Description

Loss of structural performance of lead cames associated with long-term flexing and oxidation.

Typical appearance

Cracked, opened or visibly weakened calmes; sagging panels; lead that crumbles under light handling.

Possible contributing factors

Age, wind loading, thermal cycling, vibration and original lead composition may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent of affected cames
  • evidence of panel deflection
  • associated loose glass
  • approximate age of leadwork where known
Example observation wording

Lead fatigue was recorded across the lower light, with several calmes cracked at the heart and the panel bowing into the interior.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist stained glass conservation review where lead fatigue is widespread or associated with panel deflection.

Cracked lead came

Description

Visible fracture through the heart or flange of a lead came.

Typical appearance

Open cracks along the came; sometimes admitting daylight; reduced restraint of adjacent glass.

Possible contributing factors

Fatigue, movement, fixing stress or earlier mechanical damage may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of cracking
  • associated loose glass
  • evidence of repair attempts
  • implications for water ingress
Example observation wording

A cracked came was recorded across the upper border, with associated movement of two adjacent pieces of glass.

Failed solder joint

Description

Loss of integrity at a soldered junction between cames.

Typical appearance

Open or partially open joints; sometimes with corrosion product around the solder; loose cames at the junction.

Possible contributing factors

Original solder, oxidation, movement and stress concentration may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and number of failed joints
  • evidence of associated movement
  • presence of past resoldering
  • implications for the wider leaded matrix
Example observation wording

A failed solder joint was recorded at the intersection of the central horizontal saddle, with the joint visibly open.

Loss of cement

Description

Loss of the waterproofing cement between the lead flanges and the glass.

Typical appearance

Open gap between glass and calme; loose glass under light pressure; sometimes light visible through the joint.

Possible contributing factors

Age, weathering, vibration and original cement formulation may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent of affected calmes
  • associated loose glass
  • implications for water ingress
  • evidence of internal condensation
Example observation wording

Loss of cement was recorded across the lower border, with several pieces visibly loose under light handling.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where cement loss is widespread or associated with significant water ingress.

Lead corrosion product

Description

White or grey corrosion products on the surface of lead cames.

Typical appearance

White, powdery or crusty deposit on the calmes; sometimes localised to internal faces; can stain adjacent glass.

Possible contributing factors

Organic acid emissions, condensation and proximity to certain timber species may contribute to lead corrosion.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of corrosion product
  • association with internal conditions
  • any associated staining of adjacent glass
  • environmental context of the window
Example observation wording

Lead corrosion product was recorded on the internal face of several cames, with associated white deposits on the adjacent stonework.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where lead corrosion appears active or widespread.

Distorted came profile

Description

Lead cames that have departed from their original section or profile.

Typical appearance

Flattened, twisted or out-of-plane calmes; sometimes with associated loose glass.

Possible contributing factors

Past handling, impact, panel movement or attempts at repair may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent
  • associated glass condition
  • evidence of past intervention
  • implications for restraint of glass
Example observation wording

Distorted came profiles were recorded along the lower edge of the panel, with several flanges flattened and loose against the rebate.

Support bars and ferramenta

Corroded saddle bars

Description

Corrosion of horizontal support bars within the window opening.

Typical appearance

Orange-brown corrosion product on bars; sometimes with staining of adjacent stone or lead; reduced effective section.

Possible contributing factors

Atmospheric moisture, coating failure and contact with damp masonry may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and location
  • any associated staining
  • evidence of section loss
  • condition of ties between bar and panel
Example observation wording

Corroded saddle bars were recorded across the south-facing window, with visible corrosion product and brown staining on the adjacent stonework.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist or structural review where corrosion has reduced section in primary support members.

Failed copper ties

Description

Loss of restraint at the connections between leaded panel and saddle bars.

Typical appearance

Broken, missing or unsoldered copper ties; gaps between panel and bar; panel movement away from the supporting bar.

Possible contributing factors

Fatigue, corrosion, original soldering and movement of the panel may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • number and location of failed ties
  • evidence of panel movement
  • condition of remaining ties
  • implications for restraint at height
Example observation wording

Failed copper ties were recorded along the upper saddle bar, with the panel standing approximately 4 mm clear of the bar in places.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where loss of ties affects restraint of panels at height.

Distorted ferramenta

Description

Departure of ferramenta from its original geometry.

Typical appearance

Bowed, bent or twisted bars; sometimes with associated panel deflection.

Possible contributing factors

Impact, sustained loading, panel movement or earlier intervention may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • type and extent of distortion
  • associated panel movement
  • evidence of past intervention
  • implications for restraint
Example observation wording

A distorted saddle bar was recorded at the central horizontal of the upper light, with approximately 10 mm of bowing into the interior.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where distortion of ferramenta is associated with panel movement.

Corrosion staining from ferramenta

Description

Discolouration of glass or adjacent stone caused by corrosion products migrating from ferramenta.

Typical appearance

Orange-brown, dark or rust-coloured streaks on glass and stone below or alongside bars.

Possible contributing factors

Active corrosion of ferramenta, rainwater run-off and condensation may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • source of staining if identifiable
  • extent and direction
  • substrate affected
  • association with weathering pathways
Example observation wording

Corrosion staining was recorded on the stone tracery below the saddle bar, in a pattern consistent with run-off from the bar.

Glazing system issues

Failed glazing seal

Description

Loss of integrity at the perimeter seal between leaded panel and frame or rebate.

Typical appearance

Open joints at the rebate, missing pointing or mastic, visible water ingress paths.

Possible contributing factors

Age of pointing, movement of the surround, original detailing and weather exposure may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of failure
  • evidence of water ingress
  • condition of adjacent masonry or timber rebate
  • any associated staining inside
Example observation wording

A failed glazing seal was recorded along the lower edge of the eastern light, with visible open joints and damp staining inside.

Open rebate

Description

Gap between the leaded panel and its supporting rebate.

Typical appearance

Visible gap; sometimes admitting daylight; debris or biological growth within the gap.

Possible contributing factors

Movement, pointing failure, panel deflection or original construction may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and approximate width
  • any associated debris or growth
  • implications for water shedding
  • evidence of associated panel movement
Example observation wording

An open rebate was recorded along the lower edge of the central light, with daylight visible through the gap.

Water ingress at glazing

Description

Evidence of water passing through the glazing system into the interior.

Typical appearance

Damp staining inside the rebate, water trails on the interior face of the glass, deposits on internal cames.

Possible contributing factors

Failed seals, open rebates, defective rainwater goods above or condensation may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and pattern of ingress
  • evidence of run-off pathways
  • association with rainfall events where reported
  • condition of adjacent fabric
Example observation wording

Evidence of water ingress was recorded at the lower rebate of the south-facing window, with damp staining extending onto the internal stonework.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where water ingress affects significant historic glazing or adjacent fabric.

Condensation within glazing

Description

Visible condensation between the historic glazing and any protective glazing or on the internal face of the window.

Typical appearance

Misting, droplets or run-marks on glass surfaces; sometimes with associated salt or biological deposits.

Possible contributing factors

Differences between internal and external temperatures, ventilation arrangements and protective glazing design may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and frequency of condensation where reported
  • ventilation arrangement of any protective glazing
  • associated paint or glass deterioration
  • internal heating regime where known
Example observation wording

Condensation was recorded on the internal face of the protective glazing in cold weather, with associated run-marks on the historic glass beneath.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review of the ventilation regime where condensation is affecting historic painted glass.

Bowing and structural movement

Panel bowing

Description

Out-of-plane deflection of a leaded panel within its frame.

Typical appearance

Visible curvature of the panel when viewed obliquely; gap or excessive pressure at saddle bars.

Possible contributing factors

Lead fatigue, wind loading, failed ties, panel weight and movement of the surround may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • approximate magnitude of bow
  • direction (internal or external)
  • evidence of progression
  • association with failed ties or fatigue
Example observation wording

Panel bowing of approximately 25 mm was recorded in the central light, with the panel deflected into the interior.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review without delay where significant panel bowing is recorded, particularly at height.

Panel sagging

Description

Downward deflection of a leaded panel under its own weight.

Typical appearance

Reduced height of the panel within the rebate; gaps at the head; compression at the base; sometimes associated lead fatigue.

Possible contributing factors

Lead fatigue, lack of support, original lead composition and gravity over long periods may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent of sagging
  • evidence of associated lead fatigue
  • condition at head and base of the panel
  • implications for design legibility
Example observation wording

Sagging was recorded in the upper light, with the panel approximately 8 mm lower at the centre than at its edges.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation review where panel sagging is significant or associated with widespread lead fatigue.

Tracery distortion

Description

Distortion of stone or metal tracery affecting the geometry of the glazed openings.

Typical appearance

Cracking in tracery, displaced sections, gaps at junctions with glazing, distorted panel shapes.

Possible contributing factors

Movement of the surrounding fabric, corrosion of embedded iron or original construction may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and type of distortion
  • associated cracking in tracery
  • implications for restraint of glazing
  • evidence of progression
Example observation wording

Tracery distortion was recorded at the head of the south-facing window, with cracking visible adjacent to embedded ironwork.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist or structural review where tracery distortion is recorded; embedded iron may be a contributing factor.

Environmental deposits and staining

External soiling

Description

Adherent atmospheric soiling on the external face of glass and leadwork.

Typical appearance

Dark, often greasy deposits on external surfaces; concentrated in sheltered or run-off zones.

Possible contributing factors

Atmospheric pollution, traffic, proximity to ground and lack of cleaning may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and pattern of soiling
  • association with run-off pathways
  • whether soiling obscures condition assessment
  • any associated chemical staining
Example observation wording

External soiling was recorded across the lower lights, with darker deposits concentrated in sheltered zones beneath the hood mould.

Internal soiling

Description

Soiling on the internal face of glass associated with internal sources.

Typical appearance

Dark or greasy deposits on the interior face; sometimes following condensation patterns or proximity to heating.

Possible contributing factors

Candles, oil lamps, heating systems, condensation and lack of cleaning may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent
  • association with heating or lighting sources
  • any associated condensation pattern
  • stability of paint beneath
Example observation wording

Internal soiling was recorded across the chancel glazing, with darker deposits concentrated above the historic heating pipes.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review before any cleaning of internal soiling on painted glass.

Run-off staining

Description

Discolouration following the path of rainwater across the external face of glass and leadwork.

Typical appearance

Linear streaks following gravity; sometimes with concentrated deposits beneath ferramenta or stonework.

Possible contributing factors

Defective rainwater detailing, run-off from soiled fabric above and ferramenta corrosion may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • direction and extent of staining
  • source of run-off where identifiable
  • association with corrosion staining
  • implications for ongoing soiling
Example observation wording

Run-off staining was recorded on the external face of the lower lights, with streaks consistent with run-off from the soiled stonework above.

Salt deposits

Description

White or pale crystalline deposits on glass, leadwork or adjacent fabric.

Typical appearance

Whitish powdery or crystalline material on surfaces; sometimes seasonal; can be associated with damp adjacent stone.

Possible contributing factors

Moisture movement, salt-bearing water reaching the surface and de-icing salts may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent
  • association with damp stone or run-off
  • seasonality where known
  • any associated corrosion or surface loss
Example observation wording

Salt deposits were recorded on the internal stonework adjacent to the lower lights, with associated dampness in the rebate.

Biological growth

Algae on glass

Description

Green or dark biological growth on the external face of glass.

Typical appearance

Greenish, brown or black film on glass and leadwork; particularly in damp or shaded conditions.

Possible contributing factors

Sustained surface dampness, sheltered orientation and proximity to vegetation may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and location
  • association with shading or damp surfaces
  • stability of paint beneath
  • implications for cleaning regimes
Example observation wording

Algae was recorded on the external face of the lower lights of the north window, where the orientation receives little direct sunlight.

Lichen on leadwork

Description

Lichen colonising lead cames or adjacent stonework.

Typical appearance

Crusty, leafy or powdery growths on cames and adjacent fabric; varied colour.

Possible contributing factors

Long-term exposure, clean atmosphere, sheltered orientation and lack of disturbance may support lichen growth.

Recording prompts
  • extent and type of growth where identifiable
  • association with weathering surfaces
  • any apparent effect on the substrate
  • significance of the affected area
Example observation wording

Lichen was recorded on the external face of several cames in the upper lights, with patches across an area approximately 200 mm wide.

Plant growth in glazing system

Description

Higher plants colonising joints, rebates or adjacent stonework around the glazing.

Typical appearance

Mosses, ferns or small plants rooting in damp joints; sometimes visible above the glazing line.

Possible contributing factors

Sustained moisture, debris accumulation and lack of maintenance may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • type of growth
  • extent and location
  • association with water retention
  • implications for the glazing system
Example observation wording

Plant growth was recorded in the rebate above the western window, with small ferns established in retained debris.

Previous repairs and protective glazing issues

Mending lead

Description

An applied lead came added across a cracked piece of glass as a strap repair.

Typical appearance

Narrow lead strip soldered across a crack; sometimes obscuring painted detail; visible on internal or external face.

Possible contributing factors

Past repair to stabilise cracked glass without removing the piece may have introduced mending leads.

Recording prompts
  • number and location of mending leads
  • any obscured painted detail
  • condition of the underlying crack
  • stability of the repair
Example observation wording

Several mending leads were recorded across cracked pieces in the lower light, partly obscuring the figure of the donor.

Edge-bonded repair

Description

Cracked glass stabilised by adhesive applied along the crack edges, intended to avoid the use of mending leads.

Typical appearance

Visible repaired crack with thin adhesive line; sometimes minimally visible from one face.

Possible contributing factors

Past conservation interventions using reversible or semi-reversible adhesives may have introduced edge-bonded repairs.

Recording prompts
  • location of repairs
  • condition and stability
  • any evidence of yellowing or discoloration of the adhesive
  • comparison with adjacent unrepaired pieces
Example observation wording

An edge-bonded repair was recorded on a cracked piece in the central light, with the adhesive line stable and minimally visible.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review before any disturbance of edge-bonded repairs on historic glass.

Earlier releading

Description

Evidence that a panel has been wholly or partly releaded at some point in its history.

Typical appearance

Differences in came profile, alignment or surface; sometimes with associated rearrangement of pieces.

Possible contributing factors

Past programmes of conservation, restoration or repair may have introduced replacement leadwork.

Recording prompts
  • extent of releading
  • condition of replacement leadwork
  • any associated rearrangement of glass
  • documentary evidence where available
Example observation wording

Evidence of earlier releading was recorded in the lower border, where calme profiles differ from those in the main figural panels.

Replacement glass

Description

Pieces of glass that are visibly later than the surrounding original fabric.

Typical appearance

Differences in colour, surface texture, paint style or weathering compared with surrounding pieces.

Possible contributing factors

Past replacement following damage, loss or alteration may have introduced non-original glass.

Recording prompts
  • location and number of replacement pieces
  • differences from original fabric
  • condition of replacement pieces
  • documentary references where available
Example observation wording

Replacement glass was recorded in two quarries of the upper border, with brighter colour and less surface weathering than the surrounding fabric.

Inappropriate previous repair

Description

An earlier repair that appears inappropriate in material, extent or compatibility with the historic glazing.

Typical appearance

Use of unsuitable adhesives, mismatched glass, oversized mending leads or visibly degraded repair material.

Possible contributing factors

Past repairs of limited specification, emergency measures or use of generic materials may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • type and extent of repair
  • condition of repair material
  • compatibility with surrounding fabric
  • implications for the affected glazing
Example observation wording

An apparently inappropriate previous repair was recorded across the lower border, with discoloured adhesive and a non-matching infill piece.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review before any removal or replacement of historic repair material on stained glass.

Protective glazing performance issues

Description

Issues with the performance of a protective glazing system installed externally to the historic glazing.

Typical appearance

Condensation between layers, debris accumulation in the cavity, biological growth, damaged or distorted external panes.

Possible contributing factors

Design of ventilation, original installation quality and maintenance regime may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • type of protective glazing in place
  • evidence of condensation or biological activity in the cavity
  • condition of external panes and frames
  • ventilation arrangement
Example observation wording

Protective glazing performance issues were recorded at the south-facing window, with seasonal condensation between layers and debris accumulation along the lower edge.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review of protective glazing where condensation, biological growth or detrimental microclimate effects are observed.

Recording reminders

Describe what is visible. Record the observed condition, its location, extent and any associated evidence before attempting interpretation.

Avoid:

  • handling friable painted glass without specialist input;
  • assuming urgency without evidence of active loss or risk;
  • describing treatment in a survey observation rather than in a separate recommendation.

Prefer cautious language such as:

  • “observed”, “recorded”, “visible”;
  • “may indicate”, “can be associated with”, “consistent with”;
  • “record whether…”, “consider specialist review where…”.
Specialist review

When to consider specialist conservation review

Many conditions in this volume — including crizzling, friable or flaking paint, loose fragments, significant panel bowing, failed ties at height, water ingress into historic glazing and protective glazing microclimate issues — warrant qualified stained glass conservation or structural advice before any intervention is contemplated. The Responsible Commissioning Guide offers further prompts for determining when specialist review, testing, investigation or monitoring may be appropriate.

Other Defect Atlas volumes

The Defect Atlas currently includes volumes for architectural metalwork, stone, timber and stained glass. Further volumes — covering coatings, masonry assemblies and bronze sculpture — may follow.

Related tools

Related Atlas volumes

Other Defect Atlas volumes — open a sibling area within Collections & glazing or browse across the wider atlas programme.

This atlas supports recognition and description only. It does not confirm causes, prescribe treatment, replace testing or replace specialist conservation advice. Stained glass is highly sensitive fabric; refer uncertain or risk-bearing observations to qualified stained glass conservators.