Resources
Knowledge Tools

Defect Atlas — Textiles

A practical guide to recognising and describing common conditions and defects encountered on textiles during conservation surveys.

Using this volume

This volume of the Defect Atlas is a recognition and description aid for surveyors recording textiles. It supports consistent terminology and cautious observation, not diagnosis, treatment or specification.

The atlas helps users:

  • recognise common conditions encountered on textiles, embellishments, mounts and supports;
  • describe what is visible in clear, neutral language;
  • avoid unsupported diagnosis of cause, dye class or urgency;
  • identify situations where specialist textile conservation review may be appropriate.

The atlas does not:

  • confirm causes of deterioration or identify fibres, dyes or finishes;
  • prescribe cleaning, consolidation, support or repair;
  • replace fibre, dye or technical analysis;
  • replace specialist textile conservation advice.
Where this sits

A practical survey resource, not a terminology reference

The Defect Atlas is part of Survey Resources — practical guides that support recording in the field. It is not part of the Reference Library, which holds curated terminology and material definitions, and it is separate from project-specific references held within individual projects.

Defect categories

Entries are grouped informally under the broad themes below. Many conditions span more than one theme; record what is observed rather than forcing a single category.

Individual defect entries

55 entries. Use cautious language throughout: describe what is visible, and reserve interpretation for sections explicitly identified as such.

Fibre deterioration

Fibre embrittlement

Description

Loss of fibre flexibility, with the textile becoming stiff and prone to fracture under minimal handling.

Typical appearance

Stiffened handle; audible cracking on flexing; fibres that snap rather than bend; sometimes discolouration.

Possible contributing factors

Cumulative light exposure, oxidation, pollutants or past treatments may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and distribution of embrittlement
  • areas where flexing or folding has occurred
  • any associated fibre loss or breakage
  • whether handling appears to cause further damage
Example observation wording

The silk lining was recorded as embrittled across the central panel, with fibres fracturing under minimal handling.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist textile conservation review before further handling where embrittlement is widespread or progressive.

Fibre weakening

Description

Reduction in fibre tensile strength without overt loss, often detected through handling rather than visual inspection.

Typical appearance

Reduced resistance under light handling; threads that part with minimal tension; sometimes accompanied by colour change.

Possible contributing factors

Long-term environmental exposure, photodegradation or chemical residues may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • areas where weakening is most apparent
  • whether weakening is uniform or localised
  • association with discolouration or staining
  • evidence of fibre loss in handling areas
Example observation wording

Fibre weakening was recorded across the upper section, with reduced resistance noted at the suspension edge.

Powdering fibres

Description

Fine particulate loss from the textile surface as fibres break down into a powder-like residue.

Typical appearance

Loose dust or fibre fragments on or beneath the textile; sometimes visible against a contrasting surface.

Possible contributing factors

Advanced photodegradation, hydrolysis or chemical degradation may contribute; weighted silks and degraded cellulosics are particularly susceptible.

Recording prompts
  • presence of loose powder on or below the textile
  • extent of affected area
  • association with particular colours or weighted areas
  • stability under minimal handling
Example observation wording

Powdering of fibres was recorded along the lower hem, with loose fibre dust collecting on the storage surface beneath.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation review without delay where powdering is observed; affected material may not survive further handling.

Loss of tensile strength

Description

General reduction in the textile's ability to bear its own weight or sustain handling.

Typical appearance

Tearing under minimal load; thread breakage at handling points; inability to support the textile from its original hanging or mount.

Possible contributing factors

Cumulative fibre degradation, light damage, pollutants and prior mechanical stress may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • areas of greatest weakness
  • whether the textile can be safely supported as currently mounted
  • any recent thread breakage or tearing
  • associated indicators of degradation
Example observation wording

Loss of tensile strength was recorded across the wool tapestry, with thread breakage observed along the upper supporting edge.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review before further display or handling where tensile strength is significantly reduced.

Differential fibre degradation

Description

Variation in the rate or extent of fibre deterioration across the textile, often associated with particular dyes, fibres or treatments.

Typical appearance

Localised loss, weakening or colour change in specific areas, colours or yarn types while adjacent material remains intact.

Possible contributing factors

Iron mordants, weighted silks, particular dye classes or differential exposure may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • pattern of differential degradation
  • association with specific colours or fibres
  • extent of loss within affected areas
  • stability of surrounding material
Example observation wording

Differential degradation was recorded in the black silk areas, with loss and fragmentation observed against intact surrounding material.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where differential degradation is associated with progressive loss.

Structural damage and loss

Broken threads

Description

Discontinuities in individual warp, weft or stitching threads, with broken ends visible on the textile surface or reverse.

Typical appearance

Visible broken ends; loose thread tails; localised disruption of the weave structure.

Possible contributing factors

Mechanical stress, fibre weakening, handling at concentrated points or pest activity may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of broken threads
  • whether breakage is concentrated at handling points
  • any associated loss of structure
  • evidence of progression
Example observation wording

Broken warp threads were recorded along the lower right edge, with several loose ends visible on the reverse.

Thread loss

Description

Areas where individual threads have been lost from the textile, leaving voids within the weave structure.

Typical appearance

Open weave structure; visible underlying support, lining or void where threads are missing; sometimes accompanied by fraying at edges of loss.

Possible contributing factors

Cumulative fibre degradation, abrasion, pest activity or past damage may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of thread loss
  • type of threads affected (warp, weft, supplementary)
  • stability of adjacent material
  • evidence of continuing loss
Example observation wording

Thread loss was recorded across an area approximately 80 mm square in the lower section, exposing the supporting fabric beneath.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where thread loss is extensive or progressive.

Yarn slippage

Description

Displacement of yarns within the weave structure, leaving gaps or distorted areas without outright fibre loss.

Typical appearance

Open spaces between yarns; bunched yarns adjacent to displaced areas; visible distortion of the weave grid.

Possible contributing factors

Loose original construction, mechanical stress, mounting tension or past wear may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of slippage
  • direction of yarn movement
  • any associated thread breakage
  • stability of the affected area
Example observation wording

Yarn slippage was recorded in the central area, with several weft yarns displaced and grouped towards the lower edge.

Fraying edges

Description

Progressive loss of edge threads producing a frayed or unravelling perimeter.

Typical appearance

Loose, untwisted or detached threads at edges; reducing edge width; sometimes accompanied by associated thread loss.

Possible contributing factors

Edge handling, lack of edge finish, abrasion or fibre degradation may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of fraying
  • whether original edge finish remains intact
  • associated thread loss
  • evidence of ongoing unravelling
Example observation wording

Fraying was recorded along the lower edge of the hanging, with loose threads extending up to 20 mm beyond the original edge line.

Pile loss

Description

Loss of pile from velvets, carpets or other cut or looped textiles, leaving the foundation weave exposed.

Typical appearance

Thinned or absent pile; visible foundation weave; sometimes associated with traffic patterns or wear lines.

Possible contributing factors

Wear, abrasion, insect activity or past cleaning may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of pile loss
  • pattern of wear (linear, traffic-related, generalised)
  • stability of remaining pile
  • condition of exposed foundation
Example observation wording

Pile loss was recorded in a band approximately 200 mm wide across the central area, with the foundation weave visible.

Detached structural elements

Description

Loss or detachment of decorative or structural elements applied to the textile, such as appliqué, trims or embellishments.

Typical appearance

Loose, partially attached or absent elements; sometimes with residual stitching marks or adhesive residue.

Possible contributing factors

Thread degradation, adhesive failure, mechanical stress or past handling may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • type and number of detached or missing elements
  • location and stability of remaining elements
  • evidence of attachment method
  • presence of detached pieces in storage or display area
Example observation wording

Two of the six applied silk roundels were recorded as detached, with residual stitching marks visible.

Bead or embellishment loss

Description

Loss of beads, sequins, metal threads or other embellishments from a decorated textile.

Typical appearance

Empty stitching loops; missing beads against patterned ground; sometimes loose elements collected in folds or storage.

Possible contributing factors

Stitching thread degradation, mechanical stress or past wear may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and distribution of loss
  • any retained loose elements
  • condition of remaining attachment threads
  • areas at risk of further loss
Example observation wording

Bead loss was recorded across the bodice, with several loose beads collected in the lower fold of the storage support.

Detached trim

Description

Partial or complete detachment of an applied trim, braid, fringe or border.

Typical appearance

Hanging or loose lengths of trim; residual stitching marks on the textile; sometimes with associated thread loss along the line of attachment.

Possible contributing factors

Stitching thread degradation, handling stress or past intervention may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and length of detachment
  • condition of trim where still attached
  • evidence of past re-attachment
  • stability of remaining stitching
Example observation wording

The lower fringe was recorded as detached over approximately 300 mm of its length, hanging loose from the body of the textile.

Edge damage

Description

Generalised damage at the perimeter of the textile, including loss, fraying, distortion and weakening.

Typical appearance

Irregular edge profile; loss of original edge finish; thread loss; sometimes with associated soiling.

Possible contributing factors

Handling, mounting stress, environmental exposure or past wear may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and type of edge damage
  • stability of remaining edge
  • evidence of past repair or finishing
  • areas at risk of further loss
Example observation wording

Edge damage was recorded along the upper edge, with loss of the original woven selvedge and associated fraying.

Unsupported weakness

Description

Areas of weakened textile that bear load without underlying support, placing them at risk of progressive failure.

Typical appearance

Sagging, distortion or thinning of weakened areas; sometimes with visible thread breakage at points of stress.

Possible contributing factors

Loss of original support, fibre degradation or mounting choices may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location of unsupported areas
  • current means of support
  • evidence of stress or progression
  • associated fibre or thread damage
Example observation wording

Unsupported weakness was recorded in the central section, where degraded silk bears the weight of metal-thread embroidery above.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation review where unsupported weakness places the textile at risk of further loss.

Tears, splits and seam issues

Tears

Description

Linear breaks through the textile fabric, of varying length and orientation.

Typical appearance

Open or closed tears with possible associated thread loss, distortion or fraying along the edges.

Possible contributing factors

Mechanical stress, snagging, fibre weakness or past handling may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location, orientation and length of each tear
  • associated thread loss or fraying
  • stability of tear edges
  • evidence of past repair
Example observation wording

A horizontal tear of approximately 120 mm was recorded in the lower right quadrant, with associated fraying along the upper edge.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation review where tears affect significant areas or are associated with active loss.

Splits

Description

Linear separations within the textile typically following the warp or weft direction, often associated with weakened fibres.

Typical appearance

Straight or nearly straight openings along grain lines; sometimes accompanied by adjacent thread breakage.

Possible contributing factors

Fibre weakening along grain, weighted silks, past folding or sustained tension may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and orientation of splits
  • association with folds or fold lines
  • extent of any thread loss along the split
  • stability of adjacent material
Example observation wording

Splits were recorded along the warp direction across the upper section, generally following previous fold lines.

Seam failure

Description

Loss of stitching integrity along original or later seams, allowing panels of the textile to separate.

Typical appearance

Open seams with broken or missing stitching thread; sometimes with associated thread loss along the seam line.

Possible contributing factors

Stitching thread degradation, mechanical stress or past intervention may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and length of seam failure
  • condition of remaining stitching
  • any associated damage to adjacent fabric
  • evidence of past re-stitching
Example observation wording

Seam failure was recorded along the central back seam over approximately 200 mm, with the original stitching thread broken throughout.

Detached panels

Description

Whole panels or sections of the textile partially or fully detached from the main assembly.

Typical appearance

Separated edges of panels; loose or hanging sections; sometimes with associated stitching residues.

Possible contributing factors

Seam failure, structural weakness or past handling may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and location of detachment
  • condition of edges of detached panels
  • evidence of past re-attachment
  • stability of remaining attachments
Example observation wording

The lower lining panel was recorded as partially detached along its upper edge over approximately 400 mm.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where detachment affects significant areas of the textile or risks further loss.

Snags and pulls

Description

Localised distortion of the weave where individual yarns have been drawn out of position without breaking.

Typical appearance

Loops or raised yarns standing proud of the surface; corresponding tension or distortion in adjacent areas.

Possible contributing factors

Contact with sharp surfaces, hooks, jewellery or rough handling may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of snags
  • whether snags have caused thread breakage
  • associated distortion of the weave
  • evidence of recent or historic origin
Example observation wording

Snags were recorded in the upper section, with several yarns drawn into raised loops without associated breakage.

Distortion and deformation

Distortion

Description

Generalised departure from the textile's intended geometry, including waving, twisting or out-of-plane areas.

Typical appearance

Visible undulations; uneven hang; areas that do not lie flat; sometimes associated with damage or repair.

Possible contributing factors

Storage, mounting, moisture cycling, past repair or fibre changes may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and pattern of distortion
  • association with seams, repairs or damaged areas
  • whether distortion is recent or longstanding
  • evidence of progression
Example observation wording

Distortion was recorded across the central area of the hanging, with several waves visible in raking light.

Stretching

Description

Permanent elongation of the textile under sustained load or tension, often most pronounced at suspension points.

Typical appearance

Elongation of the textile compared to its original dimensions; thinning at stressed areas; sometimes with associated distortion.

Possible contributing factors

Sustained hanging tension, mounting under stress or fibre creep may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • areas of greatest stretching
  • association with hanging or suspension method
  • associated thread or weave damage
  • comparison with documented original dimensions where available
Example observation wording

Stretching was recorded at the upper hanging edge, with the textile noticeably elongated below the line of suspension.

Shrinkage

Description

Reduction in textile dimensions, often associated with past moisture exposure or fibre changes.

Typical appearance

Puckering or tightening of fabric; distortion around stitched or attached areas; sometimes with associated cracking of stiffened finishes.

Possible contributing factors

Past wetting, environmental cycling or original finish behaviour may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of shrinkage
  • association with past staining or water exposure
  • differential behaviour between fibres
  • evidence of progression
Example observation wording

Shrinkage was recorded across an area approximately 150 mm in diameter on the left side, with associated puckering of the surrounding fabric.

Creasing

Description

Linear distortion of the textile produced by folding, with creases that may be reversible or set.

Typical appearance

Visible fold lines on the textile surface; sometimes raised or with associated soiling or fibre damage.

Possible contributing factors

Storage, packing, handling or display arrangements may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and direction of creasing
  • whether creases are recent or set
  • associated damage along crease lines
  • evidence of past attempts at relaxation
Example observation wording

Creasing was recorded across the central section, with several pronounced horizontal folds from past storage.

Permanent folds

Description

Folds that have become set in the textile and resist relaxation, often associated with fibre damage along the fold line.

Typical appearance

Persistent, sharp fold lines; sometimes with associated fibre embrittlement, splits or thread loss along the crease.

Possible contributing factors

Long-term folded storage, fibre weakening or past treatments may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and orientation of folds
  • any associated splits or fibre loss
  • evidence of attempts at relaxation
  • stability of fold edges
Example observation wording

Permanent folds were recorded across the silk panel from past storage, with associated splitting along the fold lines.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation review where set folds are associated with splitting or significant fibre damage.

Brittle folds

Description

Fold lines along which the fibre has become brittle and prone to fracture, with or without visible cracking.

Typical appearance

Stiffened fold lines; audible cracking when flexed; sometimes with visible splits or fibre loss.

Possible contributing factors

Photodegradation, oxidation or long-term folded storage may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent of brittle folds
  • associated splits or fibre loss
  • areas at risk of fracture if flexed
  • evidence of past flexing or unfolding attempts
Example observation wording

Brittle folds were recorded across the silk lining, with audible cracking observed on minimal flexing.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review before any unfolding or relaxation is attempted on brittle folds.

Display-related distortion

Description

Distortion arising from the manner of display, particularly hanging without adequate support.

Typical appearance

Sagging at lower edges; pulled or stretched areas at suspension points; uneven hang; sometimes with associated thread breakage.

Possible contributing factors

Inadequate support, unsuitable mounts or extended display periods may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • current mounting and support arrangement
  • areas of greatest distortion
  • associated fibre or thread damage
  • duration of current display where known
Example observation wording

Display-related distortion was recorded along the lower edge, with pronounced sagging consistent with extended unsupported hanging.

Storage compression

Description

Distortion produced by compression of the textile within storage, including flattening, creasing and crushing of pile or embellishments.

Typical appearance

Flattened pile; pressure marks; set creases; sometimes with associated abrasion or soiling.

Possible contributing factors

Storage under weight, tight packing or stacked arrangements may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • areas of greatest compression
  • associated damage to pile or embellishments
  • evidence of recent or longstanding origin
  • current storage arrangement where known
Example observation wording

Storage compression was recorded across the pile, with a flattened band consistent with past folded storage.

Pressure marks

Description

Localised areas where the textile has been deformed by contact with another object or surface.

Typical appearance

Discrete impressions, flattened areas or marks corresponding to a contacting object; sometimes with associated soiling.

Possible contributing factors

Contact with hardware, mounts, stored items or display fittings may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location, size and shape of marks
  • association with identifiable contact points
  • any associated soiling or fibre damage
  • evidence of recent or longstanding origin
Example observation wording

Pressure marks were recorded on the reverse, corresponding in pattern to the underlying mount fittings.

Surface deposits and soiling

Surface dust

Description

Loose particulate deposition resting on the textile surface, generally removable through controlled methods.

Typical appearance

Visible dust on horizontal surfaces, in folds and along upward-facing pile; varying with display environment.

Possible contributing factors

Open display, environmental airflow and duration since last cleaning may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • distribution and depth of dust
  • association with environmental sources
  • areas where dust appears ingrained
  • fragility of the textile at affected areas
Example observation wording

Surface dust was recorded across the upper section, particularly along horizontal folds.

Particulate deposits

Description

Deposition of particulates beyond simple dust, including soot, fibres, plaster fragments or other site-specific material.

Typical appearance

Discrete dark, light or coloured particles on the textile; sometimes with associated staining or local damage.

Possible contributing factors

Building works, combustion sources, adjacent activities or environmental conditions may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • type and distribution of particulates
  • association with environmental events
  • evidence of staining or chemical interaction
  • fragility of the textile at affected areas
Example observation wording

Particulate deposits were recorded across the surface, including dark particles consistent with combustion residues.

Ingrained soiling

Description

Soiling that has become embedded within the textile structure, generally resistant to surface cleaning.

Typical appearance

Generalised greying or darkening of the textile; persistent discolouration following past wear; sometimes localised at handling areas.

Possible contributing factors

Long-term environmental exposure, past use, handling or incomplete past cleaning may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and distribution of soiling
  • areas of greatest concentration
  • association with wear patterns
  • evidence of past cleaning attempts
Example observation wording

Ingrained soiling was recorded across the central section, with generalised darkening of the original ground colour.

Wear at handling points

Description

Localised soiling, abrasion or fibre damage at points where the textile has been repeatedly handled.

Typical appearance

Darkening, thinning, fraying or loss at edges, handling tabs, hems or recurrent contact points.

Possible contributing factors

Repeated handling, use or display patterns may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location of handling wear
  • associated fibre damage
  • evidence of past stabilisation
  • current handling arrangements where known
Example observation wording

Wear was recorded along the lower edge consistent with repeated handling, with associated thread loss in places.

Abrasion

Description

Surface damage caused by friction against another surface, with associated fibre damage or pile loss.

Typical appearance

Thinned or worn areas; broken fibres on the surface; localised loss of pile or surface decoration.

Possible contributing factors

Contact with rough surfaces, repeated rubbing or past mounting may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of abrasion
  • association with mounts or contacting surfaces
  • stability of remaining surface
  • evidence of progression
Example observation wording

Abrasion was recorded across the upper section consistent with rubbing against the previous mount.

Biological activity

Mould growth

Description

Visible fungal growth on or within the textile, current or historic.

Typical appearance

Spotted, fuzzy or powdery growth in white, grey, green, black or pink shades; sometimes with associated staining or fibre damage.

Possible contributing factors

Past moisture exposure, high humidity or restricted air circulation may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location, extent and colour of growth
  • evidence of active versus historic activity
  • associated staining or fibre damage
  • environmental conditions in storage or display
Example observation wording

Discrete spots consistent with mould growth were recorded along the lower edge; activity status could not be confirmed at the time of survey.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation review before any handling, cleaning or relocation where mould growth is suspected.

Insect damage

Description

Damage to the textile consistent with the activity of clothes moth, carpet beetle or other textile pests.

Typical appearance

Irregular holes, grazed surfaces, loss of pile or fibre; sometimes accompanied by larval cases, frass or live or dead specimens.

Possible contributing factors

Activity of textile pests in current or past environments may contribute; species identification is not implied.

Recording prompts
  • location, extent and pattern of damage
  • associated evidence (cases, frass, specimens)
  • evidence of active versus historic activity
  • environmental and pest-management context where known
Example observation wording

Damage consistent with textile pest activity was recorded across the wool ground, with associated larval cases observed in folds.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review and integrated pest management advice where evidence of active textile pest activity is observed.

Grazing damage

Description

Surface loss of fibres without full-thickness holes, often associated with early-stage insect activity.

Typical appearance

Thinned or worn areas with characteristic grazed appearance; partial loss of pile; sometimes accompanied by fibre dust.

Possible contributing factors

Grazing by textile pest larvae or other surface-feeding activity may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of grazing
  • associated evidence of pest activity
  • comparison between affected and adjacent areas
  • evidence of progression
Example observation wording

Grazing damage was recorded across the wool pile in the central area, with associated fibre dust on the storage surface.

Pest frass

Description

Particulate evidence of pest activity, including larval frass, cast skins or other residues.

Typical appearance

Granular, fibrous or powdery residues collected in folds, on storage surfaces or trapped in pile.

Possible contributing factors

Activity of textile pests, current or historic, may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and quantity of evidence
  • type of residues observed
  • association with visible damage
  • evidence of active versus historic activity
Example observation wording

Pest frass was recorded in folds along the lower edge, consistent with past activity; no live specimens were observed at the time of survey.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist integrated pest management advice where evidence suggests recent or active pest activity.

Moisture and staining

Staining

Description

Localised discolouration of the textile produced by contact with foreign material.

Typical appearance

Discrete or diffuse marks of varying colour, shape and intensity; sometimes with associated fibre damage or stiffening.

Possible contributing factors

Past contact with food, beverages, biological material, environmental residues or handling may contribute; identification of staining agent is rarely possible from observation alone.

Recording prompts
  • location, size and colour of stains
  • associated fibre damage or stiffening
  • evidence of past cleaning attempts
  • stability of the staining over time
Example observation wording

Several discrete stains were recorded across the lower section, varying in colour from pale yellow to brown.

Tide marks

Description

Linear or curvilinear marks at the boundary of a past moisture event, where dissolved material has accumulated as the textile dried.

Typical appearance

Hard-edged lines following the limit of moisture penetration; often darker than adjacent material; sometimes with associated staining or fibre damage.

Possible contributing factors

Past wetting, capillary movement and drying may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location, length and orientation of tide marks
  • associated staining within the affected area
  • evidence of fibre damage along the line
  • any record of past water events
Example observation wording

A tide mark was recorded across the lower section, consistent with a past water event followed by drying in place.

Water staining

Description

Diffuse discolouration from past moisture exposure, often without a defined boundary.

Typical appearance

Generalised darkening or yellowing of affected areas; sometimes with associated tide marks at the perimeter.

Possible contributing factors

Past leaks, condensation or other moisture exposure may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and distribution of staining
  • association with tide marks or sharp boundaries
  • any record of past water events
  • evidence of fibre weakening within affected areas
Example observation wording

Water staining was recorded across an area approximately 300 mm square on the lower right, with a defined tide mark at its lower edge.

Metallic-thread corrosion effects

Description

Visible alteration of metal-wound or metal-foil threads, including tarnishing, blackening or loss of reflectivity, often associated with moisture or pollutants.

Typical appearance

Darkened, dulled or green-tinged metal threads; sometimes with associated staining of adjacent fibres or thread breakage.

Possible contributing factors

Atmospheric pollutants, humidity cycling or past wetting may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of corrosion effects
  • associated staining or damage to adjacent fibres
  • evidence of past cleaning or coating
  • stability of metal threads under handling
Example observation wording

Tarnishing of metallic threads was recorded across the embroidered motifs, with associated darkening of adjacent silk.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist review where corrosion of metal threads is affecting adjacent textile fibres.

Light and environmental damage

Fading

Description

Loss of colour intensity in dyes or pigments resulting from cumulative light exposure.

Typical appearance

Reduced colour saturation across exposed areas; visible difference between display surface and reverse or covered areas.

Possible contributing factors

Cumulative exposure to visible light and ultraviolet radiation may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and distribution of fading
  • comparison between exposed and unexposed areas
  • any record of past light exposure or display history
  • evidence of associated fibre degradation
Example observation wording

Fading was recorded across the front of the textile, with the original colour preserved at the reverse and within folds.

Differential fading

Description

Uneven fading across the textile, often associated with particular dyes, shading from objects or partial cover during display.

Typical appearance

Patterned variation in colour intensity; sharp lines where partial cover has shielded portions of the textile; differential change between dye classes.

Possible contributing factors

Object shadows, mount layouts or differential dye sensitivity may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • pattern and orientation of differential fading
  • association with display arrangements
  • differential behaviour between dye colours
  • evidence of past covers or mounts
Example observation wording

Differential fading was recorded across the panel, with sharp boundaries consistent with past partial cover during display.

Colour shift

Description

Change in hue rather than simple loss of saturation, often associated with chemical changes in dyes.

Typical appearance

Original colours appearing altered in hue, sometimes towards yellow, brown or grey; differences between exposed and protected areas.

Possible contributing factors

Photochemical alteration of dyes, oxidation or interaction with pollutants may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent and direction of colour shift
  • comparison with protected reverse or covered areas
  • association with particular colours or dye classes
  • evidence of progression
Example observation wording

Colour shift was recorded across the embroidered ground, with original greens now appearing predominantly brown.

Photodegradation indicators

Description

Combined evidence of fibre weakening, embrittlement and colour change consistent with cumulative light damage.

Typical appearance

Faded, brittle, weakened material on the display surface; intact, less faded material on the reverse or in folds.

Possible contributing factors

Cumulative exposure to visible light and ultraviolet radiation may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent of differential damage between exposed and protected areas
  • associated fibre weakening or loss
  • display history where known
  • current environmental conditions
Example observation wording

Photodegradation indicators were recorded across the display face, with associated embrittlement and fibre loss consistent with extended exposure.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation and environmental review where photodegradation is widespread or progressive.

Previous repairs and interventions

Previous patch repair

Description

Earlier patching of damaged areas using new or salvaged textile, of varying technical quality and conservation appropriateness.

Typical appearance

Visible patches on front or reverse; differences in colour, weave or fibre type compared with original; sometimes with associated distortion at the edges.

Possible contributing factors

Past repair campaigns of varying date and approach may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location, size and method of patches
  • compatibility with original material
  • stability of patch attachment
  • any associated damage to original material
Example observation wording

A previous patch repair was recorded on the reverse, with a square of dissimilar fabric secured by stitching along its perimeter.

Adhesive residue

Description

Visible adhesive or glue residues from past repairs, sometimes with associated staining or stiffening of the textile.

Typical appearance

Glossy, yellowed or stiffened areas; sometimes with associated darkening of adjacent fibres; occasional brittle adhesive deposits.

Possible contributing factors

Past repair using adhesives may contribute; adhesive type is rarely identifiable from observation alone.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of residues
  • associated discolouration or stiffening
  • stability of the textile in affected areas
  • evidence of past failed repairs
Example observation wording

Adhesive residue was recorded on the reverse along a past repair edge, with associated yellowing and stiffening of the textile.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation review where adhesive residues are associated with staining or compromise to original material.

Inappropriate repair stitching

Description

Past repair stitching that is materially incompatible, mechanically damaging or visually obtrusive.

Typical appearance

Coarse or modern thread used over original material; tight stitching producing distortion; thread of incompatible colour or fibre.

Possible contributing factors

Past repairs of varying date, skill and material choice may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location, extent and method of stitching
  • any distortion or stress at stitch points
  • compatibility of repair thread with original
  • stability of original material around repairs
Example observation wording

Inappropriate repair stitching was recorded across the central tear, with coarse synthetic thread producing pronounced distortion.

Support fabric failure

Description

Failure or degradation of a support fabric previously applied to stabilise the textile.

Typical appearance

Loose, torn or detached support fabric; sometimes more degraded than the original textile; loss of intended support function.

Possible contributing factors

Age of support, environmental conditions, original material choice or fibre incompatibility may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • extent of support fabric failure
  • associated stress or damage to original material
  • evidence of past attachment method
  • current load-bearing arrangement
Example observation wording

Support fabric failure was recorded across the reverse, with the previous support partially detached and no longer providing effective support.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation review where support failure places the original textile at risk.

Past lining or backing

Description

Earlier lining, backing or interlayer applied to the textile, of varying material and condition.

Typical appearance

Secondary fabric layer attached to the reverse; sometimes visible at edges; variable condition and adhesion.

Possible contributing factors

Past conservation, display or use practices may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • type and extent of lining or backing
  • method of attachment where assessable
  • condition and stability
  • evidence of differential movement or distortion
Example observation wording

A past linen backing was recorded across the reverse, partially detached at the lower edge and showing differential discolouration.

Mounting, display and storage issues

Mount stress

Description

Localised stress on the textile associated with its current mounting, with potential for progressive damage.

Typical appearance

Pulled, stretched or distorted areas at attachment points; sometimes with associated thread loss or fibre weakening.

Possible contributing factors

Mount design, attachment method, textile weight or condition may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and extent of stress
  • method of attachment
  • associated fibre or thread damage
  • stability of current arrangement
Example observation wording

Mount stress was recorded along the upper edge, with localised pulling and thread breakage at attachment points.

Specialist review prompt

Consider specialist conservation review where current mounting is producing progressive damage.

Deformation from hanging

Description

Distortion produced by extended hanging without adequate support across the full upper edge.

Typical appearance

Sagging across the body of the textile; pulled areas at concentrated suspension points; uneven lower edge.

Possible contributing factors

Inadequate support, extended display periods or unsuitable hanging fixtures may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • current method of hanging
  • areas of greatest deformation
  • associated fibre or thread damage
  • duration of current display where known
Example observation wording

Deformation from hanging was recorded across the textile, with pronounced sagging consistent with extended unsupported display.

Pressure marks from mount fittings

Description

Localised distortion or marking produced by underlying mount fittings, fixings or supports.

Typical appearance

Discrete impressions, raised or flattened areas corresponding to mount features; sometimes with associated soiling or fibre damage.

Possible contributing factors

Mount design, fixing protrusion or extended contact may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • location and pattern of marks
  • correspondence with underlying mount features
  • associated fibre damage
  • evidence of recent or longstanding origin
Example observation wording

Pressure marks were recorded on the reverse, corresponding in pattern to the underlying mount support battens.

Storage-related damage

Description

Damage produced by current or past storage arrangements, including compression, contact with unsuitable materials and inadequate support.

Typical appearance

Creasing, compression, staining or soiling consistent with storage; sometimes with associated migration of materials from packaging.

Possible contributing factors

Storage materials, packing methods, environmental conditions or duration may contribute.

Recording prompts
  • type and extent of damage
  • association with identifiable storage practices
  • evidence of material migration from packaging
  • current storage arrangement
Example observation wording

Storage-related damage was recorded across the textile, including set creases and localised staining consistent with past packaging materials.

Recording reminders

Describe what is visible. Record the observed condition, its location, extent and any associated evidence before attempting interpretation.

Avoid:

  • handling embrittled, powdering or actively shedding textiles without specialist input;
  • assuming urgency without evidence of active loss or risk;
  • describing treatment in a survey observation rather than in a separate recommendation.

Prefer cautious language such as:

  • “observed”, “recorded”, “visible”;
  • “may indicate”, “can be associated with”, “consistent with”;
  • “record whether…”, “consider specialist review where…”.
Specialist review

When to consider specialist conservation review

Many conditions in this volume — including fibre embrittlement, powdering fibres, suspected active pest activity, mould growth, brittle folds, support failure and significant tears or losses — warrant qualified textile conservation advice before any handling, cleaning or treatment is contemplated. The Responsible Commissioning Guide offers further prompts for determining when specialist review, technical analysis, monitoring or investigation may be appropriate.

Other Defect Atlas volumes

The Defect Atlas currently includes volumes for architectural metalwork, stone, timber, stained glass, paintings and textiles. Further volumes — covering coatings, masonry assemblies and bronze sculpture — may follow.

Related tools

Related Atlas volumes

Other Defect Atlas volumes — open a sibling area within Collections & glazing or browse across the wider atlas programme.

This atlas supports recognition and description only. It does not confirm causes, prescribe treatment, replace technical analysis or replace specialist conservation advice. Textiles are highly sensitive composite objects; refer uncertain or risk-bearing observations to qualified textile conservators before any handling, cleaning or treatment is contemplated.